astronomy: was important to ancients

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents field
Weight: 0.63
, art
Weight: 0.62
, study
Weight: 0.62
, science
Weight: 0.61
, subject
Weight: 0.60
Siblings computer science
Weight: 0.36
, meteorology
Weight: 0.35
, mathematics
Weight: 0.35
, physics
Weight: 0.35
, quantum physics
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
was important to ancients 1.00
was important to ancient civilizations 0.83
was important to civilizations 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(astronomy, was important to ancients) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(astronomy, was important to ancients)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(astronomy, was important to ancients) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(astronomy, was important to ancient civilizations)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(astronomy, was important to ancients) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(astronomy, was important to ancient civilizations)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(astronomy, was important to ancients) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(astronomy, was important to ancient civilizations)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(astronomy, was important to ancients) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(astronomy, was important to civilizations)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(astronomy, was important to ancients) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(astronomy, was important to civilizations)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(astronomy, was important to ancients) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(astronomy, was important to civilizations)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(astronomy, was important to ancients) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, was important to ancient civilizations)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(astronomy, was important to ancients) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, was important to civilizations)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(astronomy, was important to ancients) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(astronomy, was important to ancients) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, was important to ancients)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(astronomy, was important to ancients) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(astronomy, was important to ancients)