astronomy: was important to civilizations

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents field
Weight: 0.63
, art
Weight: 0.62
, study
Weight: 0.62
, science
Weight: 0.61
, subject
Weight: 0.60
Siblings computer science
Weight: 0.36
, meteorology
Weight: 0.35
, mathematics
Weight: 0.35
, physics
Weight: 0.35
, quantum physics
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
was important to civilizations 1.00
was important to ancient civilizations 0.97
was important to ancients 0.77
help mankind 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(astronomy, was important to civilizations)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(astronomy, was important to civilizations)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(astronomy, was important to civilizations)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(astronomy, was important to ancient civilizations)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(astronomy, was important to civilizations)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(astronomy, was important to ancient civilizations)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(astronomy, was important to civilizations)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, was important to ancient civilizations)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(astronomy, was important to civilizations)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(astronomy, was important to ancient civilizations)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(astronomy, was important to civilizations)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(astronomy, was important to ancients)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(astronomy, was important to civilizations)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(astronomy, help mankind)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(astronomy, was important to civilizations)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(astronomy, help mankind)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(astronomy, was important to civilizations)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(astronomy, help mankind)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(astronomy, was important to civilizations)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(astronomy, was important to ancients)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(astronomy, was important to civilizations)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(astronomy, was important to ancients)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(astronomy, was important to civilizations)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, was important to ancients)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(astronomy, was important to civilizations)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, help mankind)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(astronomy, was important to civilizations)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(astronomy, was important to civilizations)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, was important to civilizations)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(astronomy, was important to civilizations)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(astronomy, was important to civilizations)