atherosclerosis: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents disease
Weight: 0.71
, factor
Weight: 0.66
, pathology
Weight: 0.63
, condition
Weight: 0.60
, congestive heart failure
Weight: 0.60
Siblings pelvic inflammatory disease
Weight: 0.38
, lyme disease
Weight: 0.38
, cystic fibrosis
Weight: 0.37
, hypertension
Weight: 0.37
, macular degeneration
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
is bad people 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(pathology, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(atherosclerosis, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(atherosclerosis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(pathology, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(atherosclerosis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pathology, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(atherosclerosis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(cystic fibrosis, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(atherosclerosis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(lyme disease, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(atherosclerosis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(hypertension, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(pathology, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(atherosclerosis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(atherosclerosis, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(atherosclerosis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(hypertension, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(hypertension, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(atherosclerosis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(cystic fibrosis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(cystic fibrosis, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(atherosclerosis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(lyme disease, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(lyme disease, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(atherosclerosis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(atherosclerosis, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(atherosclerosis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(atherosclerosis, has quality good)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(atherosclerosis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(atherosclerosis, has quality good)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(atherosclerosis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(atherosclerosis, has quality good)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(atherosclerosis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(atherosclerosis, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(atherosclerosis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(atherosclerosis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(atherosclerosis, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(atherosclerosis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(atherosclerosis, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(atherosclerosis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(pathology, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(atherosclerosis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(cystic fibrosis, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(atherosclerosis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(lyme disease, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(atherosclerosis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(hypertension, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(atherosclerosis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(pathology, has quality good)