atomic bomb: be bad for environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents nuclear weapon
Weight: 0.79
, weapon
Weight: 0.66
, invention
Weight: 0.62
, thing
Weight: 0.59
, tragedy
Weight: 0.59
Siblings neutron bomb
Weight: 0.41
, hydrogen bomb
Weight: 0.40
, atom bomb
Weight: 0.38
, chemical weapon
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for environment 1.00
has quality bad 0.80
has quality good 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(weapon, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(atomic bomb, be bad for environment)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(atomic bomb, be bad for environment)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(invention, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(atomic bomb, be bad for environment)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(weapon, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(atomic bomb, be bad for environment)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(atomic bomb, be bad for environment)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(invention, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(atomic bomb, be bad for environment)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(atomic bomb, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(invention, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(atomic bomb, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(atomic bomb, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(weapon, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(atomic bomb, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(invention, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(atomic bomb, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(atomic bomb, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(weapon, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(atomic bomb, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(invention, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(atomic bomb, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(atomic bomb, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(weapon, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(atomic bomb, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(atomic bomb, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(weapon, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(atomic bomb, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(invention, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(atomic bomb, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(hydrogen bomb, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(atomic bomb, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(chemical weapon, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(weapon, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(atomic bomb, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(atomic bomb, be bad for environment)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(weapon, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(atomic bomb, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(atomic bomb, be bad for environment)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(atomic bomb, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(atomic bomb, be bad for environment)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(invention, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(atomic bomb, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(atomic bomb, be bad for environment)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(atomic bomb, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(atomic bomb, be bad for environment)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(invention, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(atomic bomb, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(atomic bomb, be bad for environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(atomic bomb, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(chemical weapon, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(chemical weapon, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(atomic bomb, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(hydrogen bomb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(hydrogen bomb, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(atomic bomb, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(atomic bomb, be bad for environment)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(atomic bomb, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(atomic bomb, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(atomic bomb, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(atomic bomb, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(atomic bomb, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(atomic bomb, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(atomic bomb, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(atomic bomb, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(atomic bomb, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(atomic bomb, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(atomic bomb, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(atomic bomb, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(atomic bomb, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(atomic bomb, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(atomic bomb, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(atomic bomb, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(atomic bomb, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(atomic bomb, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(atomic bomb, be bad for environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(atomic bomb, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(atomic bomb, be bad for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(atomic bomb, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(invention, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(atomic bomb, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(atomic bomb, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(weapon, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(atomic bomb, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(invention, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(atomic bomb, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(atomic bomb, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(weapon, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(atomic bomb, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(hydrogen bomb, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(atomic bomb, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(chemical weapon, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(atomic bomb, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(invention, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(atomic bomb, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(atomic bomb, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(invention, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(atomic bomb, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(weapon, has quality bad)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(atomic bomb, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, has quality good)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(atomic bomb, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(weapon, has quality good)