nuclear weapon: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents chemical weapon
Weight: 0.80
, nuclear power plant
Weight: 0.75
, weapon
Weight: 0.73
, missile
Weight: 0.73
, ballistic missile
Weight: 0.67
Siblings atomic bomb
Weight: 0.79
, neutron bomb
Weight: 0.72
, hydrogen bomb
Weight: 0.72
, cruise missile
Weight: 0.71
, trident
Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality worse 0.87
has quality use 0.86
be good 0.82
has quality worth 0.82
has quality news 0.80
be bad for environment 0.80
is terrible 0.77
has quality effects 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(nuclear power plant, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(weapon, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(chemical weapon, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(missile, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(weapon, be good)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(chemical weapon, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(nuclear power plant, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(chemical weapon, has quality effects)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(missile, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(nuclear power plant, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, be bad for environment)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(missile, is terrible)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(weapon, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(chemical weapon, has quality effects)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(chemical weapon, has quality worse)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(missile, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(chemical weapon, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(weapon, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(weapon, be good)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(weapon, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(missile, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(chemical weapon, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(weapon, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(chemical weapon, has quality worse)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, be bad for environment)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(weapon, be good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(missile, is terrible)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(chemical weapon, has quality effects)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(atomic bomb, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(atomic bomb, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(hydrogen bomb, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(trident, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(atomic bomb, be bad for environment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(nuclear power plant, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(nuclear power plant, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(weapon, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(chemical weapon, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(missile, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(chemical weapon, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(weapon, be good)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(nuclear power plant, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(missile, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(chemical weapon, has quality effects)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(atomic bomb, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(atomic bomb, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(atomic bomb, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(atomic bomb, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(atomic bomb, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(atomic bomb, be bad for environment)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(hydrogen bomb, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(hydrogen bomb, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(trident, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(trident, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, has quality effects)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality effects)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, be good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(nuclear weapon, has quality effects)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(nuclear weapon, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, be good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(nuclear weapon, be good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality effects)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(weapon, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(missile, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(chemical weapon, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(weapon, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(chemical weapon, has quality worse)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, be bad for environment)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(weapon, be good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(chemical weapon, has quality effects)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(missile, is terrible)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(atomic bomb, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(atomic bomb, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(hydrogen bomb, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(trident, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(atomic bomb, be bad for environment)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(chemical weapon, has quality effects)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, be bad for environment)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(weapon, has quality bad)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(missile, is terrible)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(missile, has quality good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(chemical weapon, has quality worse)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(chemical weapon, has quality good)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(weapon, has quality good)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, has quality good)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(weapon, be good)