nuclear weapon: be good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents chemical weapon
Weight: 0.80
, nuclear power plant
Weight: 0.75
, weapon
Weight: 0.73
, missile
Weight: 0.73
, ballistic missile
Weight: 0.67
Siblings atomic bomb
Weight: 0.79
, neutron bomb
Weight: 0.72
, hydrogen bomb
Weight: 0.72
, cruise missile
Weight: 0.71
, trident
Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good 1.00
is good thing 0.87
has quality good 0.86
be good for environment 0.83
has quality bad 0.82
be bad for environment 0.79
is terrible 0.79
is horrible 0.76
is big 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(weapon, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, be good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(nuclear power plant, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, be good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(weapon, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, be good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(chemical weapon, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, be good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(nuclear power plant, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, be good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(missile, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, be good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(weapon, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, be good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(missile, is terrible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, be good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(nuclear power plant, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, be good)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(nuclear power plant, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, be good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(nuclear weapon, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(nuclear weapon, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, be bad for environment)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(nuclear weapon, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(weapon, be good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(nuclear weapon, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(missile, is terrible)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(nuclear weapon, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(missile, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(nuclear weapon, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(weapon, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(nuclear weapon, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(chemical weapon, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(nuclear weapon, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, be good for environment)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(nuclear weapon, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(weapon, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(nuclear weapon, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, be bad for environment)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(missile, is terrible)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(weapon, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(weapon, be good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(missile, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(chemical weapon, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(weapon, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, be good for environment)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(atomic bomb, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(atomic bomb, be bad for environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(atomic bomb, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(hydrogen bomb, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(atomic bomb, is big)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(trident, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(trident, is good thing)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(weapon, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, be good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(nuclear power plant, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, be good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(weapon, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, be good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(chemical weapon, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, be good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(missile, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, be good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(nuclear power plant, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, be good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(weapon, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, be good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(missile, is terrible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, be good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(nuclear power plant, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, be good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(nuclear power plant, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, be good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(nuclear weapon, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(trident, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(trident, is good thing)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(nuclear weapon, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(atomic bomb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(atomic bomb, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(nuclear weapon, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(hydrogen bomb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(hydrogen bomb, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(nuclear weapon, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(atomic bomb, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(atomic bomb, be bad for environment)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(nuclear weapon, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(atomic bomb, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(atomic bomb, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(nuclear weapon, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(trident, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(trident, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(nuclear weapon, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(atomic bomb, is big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(atomic bomb, is big)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(nuclear weapon, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(nuclear weapon, be good)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(nuclear weapon, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(nuclear weapon, is good thing)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(nuclear weapon, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(nuclear weapon, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(nuclear weapon, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, is good thing)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(nuclear weapon, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, is good thing)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(nuclear weapon, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(nuclear weapon, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(nuclear weapon, has quality good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, is good thing)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(nuclear weapon, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(nuclear weapon, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(nuclear weapon, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(nuclear weapon, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, be good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, be bad for environment)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(missile, is terrible)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(missile, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(weapon, be good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(weapon, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, be good for environment)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(chemical weapon, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(weapon, has quality good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(atomic bomb, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(atomic bomb, be bad for environment)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(trident, is good thing)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(atomic bomb, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(hydrogen bomb, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(atomic bomb, is big)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(trident, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(nuclear weapon, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(weapon, be good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(nuclear weapon, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(nuclear weapon, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, be bad for environment)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(nuclear weapon, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(missile, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(nuclear weapon, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(chemical weapon, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(nuclear weapon, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(weapon, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(nuclear weapon, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, be good for environment)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(nuclear weapon, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(missile, is terrible)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(nuclear weapon, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(weapon, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(nuclear weapon, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, has quality good)