nuclear weapon: has quality effects

Related concepts

Parents	chemical weapon Weight: 0.80 , nuclear power plant Weight: 0.75 , weapon Weight: 0.73 , missile Weight: 0.73 , ballistic missile Weight: 0.67
Siblings	atomic bomb Weight: 0.79 , neutron bomb Weight: 0.72 , hydrogen bomb Weight: 0.72 , cruise missile Weight: 0.71 , trident Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality effects	1.00
reduce effects	0.87
reduce effects of pollution	0.83
effect environment	0.79
reduce effects of thermal pollution	0.78
has quality use	0.78
has quality bad	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.33

Plausible(chemical weapon, has quality effects) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, has quality effects)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(nuclear power plant, reduce effects of pollution) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, has quality effects)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(nuclear power plant, reduce effects of thermal pollution) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, has quality effects)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.48

Plausible(weapon, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, has quality effects)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(nuclear power plant, effect environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, has quality effects)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.14

Plausible(nuclear power plant, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, has quality effects)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.42

Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality effects) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Plausible(chemical weapon, has quality effects)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.42

Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality effects) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, has quality bad)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.42

Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality effects) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, effect environment)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.42

Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality effects) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Plausible(weapon, has quality bad)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.42

Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality effects) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, reduce effects of pollution)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.42

Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality effects) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, reduce effects of thermal pollution)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality effects) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, has quality bad)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality effects) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Remarkable(weapon, has quality bad)

0.13

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality effects) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, reduce effects of pollution)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality effects) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(chemical weapon, has quality effects)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality effects) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, reduce effects of thermal pollution)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality effects) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, effect environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality effects) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Remarkable(atomic bomb, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.33

Plausible(chemical weapon, has quality effects) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality effects) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality effects)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(nuclear power plant, reduce effects of pollution) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality effects) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality effects)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(nuclear power plant, reduce effects of thermal pollution) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality effects) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality effects)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(nuclear power plant, effect environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality effects) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality effects)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.48

Plausible(weapon, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality effects) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality effects)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.14

Plausible(nuclear power plant, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality effects) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality effects)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.42

Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality effects) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

Remarkable(atomic bomb, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Plausible(atomic bomb, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.42

Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality effects) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Salient(nuclear weapon, has quality effects)

Similarity expansion

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.86

Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality effects) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.62

Salient(nuclear weapon, has quality effects) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Salient(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.42

Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality effects) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.86

Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality effects) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality use)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.62

Salient(nuclear weapon, has quality effects) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Salient(nuclear weapon, has quality use)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.42

Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality effects) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality use)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.30

Typical(nuclear weapon, has quality effects) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, has quality use)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.30

Typical(nuclear weapon, has quality effects) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.62

Salient(nuclear weapon, has quality effects) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, has quality effects) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality effects)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.42

Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality effects) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, has quality effects)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality effects) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Typical(chemical weapon, has quality effects)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality effects) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, effect environment)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality effects) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, has quality bad)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality effects) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, reduce effects of thermal pollution)

0.22

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality effects) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, reduce effects of pollution)

0.16

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality effects) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(weapon, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality effects) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Typical(atomic bomb, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.30

Typical(nuclear weapon, has quality effects) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Typical(chemical weapon, has quality effects)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.30

Typical(nuclear weapon, has quality effects) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, effect environment)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.30

Typical(nuclear weapon, has quality effects) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, has quality bad)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.30

Typical(nuclear weapon, has quality effects) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, reduce effects of thermal pollution)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.30

Typical(nuclear weapon, has quality effects) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, reduce effects of pollution)

0.19

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.30

Typical(nuclear weapon, has quality effects) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(weapon, has quality bad)