atomic number: be better bases for classification of elements

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents information
Weight: 0.54
, property
Weight: 0.48
Siblings military intelligence
Weight: 0.31
, computer database
Weight: 0.31
, historical site
Weight: 0.30
, telephone numbers
Weight: 0.30
, intelligence
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better bases for classification of elements 1.00
be most appropriate parameter for classification of elements 0.83
be about relationships useful in classification 0.80
be most appropriate parameter for classification 0.79
be about relationships useful in classifications 0.78
be about evolutionary relationships useful in classification 0.76
be about evolutionary relationships useful in classifications 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(atomic number, be better bases for classification of elements) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(atomic number, be better bases for classification of elements)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(atomic number, be better bases for classification of elements) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(atomic number, be most appropriate parameter for classification of elements)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(atomic number, be better bases for classification of elements) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(atomic number, be most appropriate parameter for classification)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(atomic number, be better bases for classification of elements) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(atomic number, be most appropriate parameter for classification of elements)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(atomic number, be better bases for classification of elements) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(atomic number, be most appropriate parameter for classification of elements)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(atomic number, be better bases for classification of elements) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(atomic number, be most appropriate parameter for classification)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(atomic number, be better bases for classification of elements) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(atomic number, be most appropriate parameter for classification)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(atomic number, be better bases for classification of elements) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(atomic number, be most appropriate parameter for classification of elements)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(atomic number, be better bases for classification of elements) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(atomic number, be most appropriate parameter for classification)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(atomic number, be better bases for classification of elements) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(atomic number, be better bases for classification of elements) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(atomic number, be better bases for classification of elements)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(atomic number, be better bases for classification of elements) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(atomic number, be better bases for classification of elements)