attention: be important for system

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents consideration
Weight: 0.64
, experience
Weight: 0.62
, resource
Weight: 0.60
, topic
Weight: 0.60
, gift
Weight: 0.57
Siblings mind
Weight: 0.32
, support
Weight: 0.31
, care
Weight: 0.31
, concern
Weight: 0.31
, excitement
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important for system 1.00
be important in system 0.99
help system 0.87
be important to organisation 0.83
be important for services 0.81
be important for us 0.80
be important in service 0.80
be important for being 0.80
be for others important 0.79
be important in country 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(resource, be important to organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(attention, be important for system)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(experience, be important in service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(attention, be important for system)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(attention, be important for system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(resource, be important to organisation)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(attention, be important for system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(experience, be important in service)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(attention, be important for system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(experience, be important in service)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(attention, be important for system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(resource, be important to organisation)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(attention, be important for system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(concern, be for others important)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(attention, be important for system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(support, be important in system)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(resource, be important to organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(attention, be important for system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(attention, be important for system)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(experience, be important in service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(attention, be important for system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(attention, be important for system)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(attention, be important for system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(support, be important in system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(support, be important in system)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(attention, be important for system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(concern, be for others important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(concern, be for others important)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(attention, be important for system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(attention, be important for system)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(attention, be important for system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(attention, be important for system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(attention, be important for system)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(attention, be important for system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(attention, be important for system)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(attention, be important for system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(resource, be important to organisation)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(attention, be important for system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(experience, be important in service)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(attention, be important for system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(support, be important in system)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(attention, be important for system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(concern, be for others important)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(attention, be important for system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(resource, be important to organisation)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(attention, be important for system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(experience, be important in service)