attention: be in other guys

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents consideration
Weight: 0.64
, experience
Weight: 0.62
, resource
Weight: 0.60
, topic
Weight: 0.60
, gift
Weight: 0.57
Siblings mind
Weight: 0.32
, support
Weight: 0.31
, care
Weight: 0.31
, concern
Weight: 0.31
, excitement
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in other guys 1.00
have good guy 0.86
have guy 0.84
is good guy 0.84
is guy 0.82
be considered bad players 0.80
be for us 0.78
be seen by many players 0.78
be important for us 0.77
be considered players 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(attention, be in other guys)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(support, be considered bad players)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(attention, be in other guys)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(mind, have good guy)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(attention, be in other guys)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(mind, is good guy)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(attention, be in other guys)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(concern, be for us)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(attention, be in other guys)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(mind, have guy)
...

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(attention, be in other guys)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(mind, have guy)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(mind, have guy)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(attention, be in other guys)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(concern, be for us)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(concern, be for us)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(attention, be in other guys)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(support, be considered bad players)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(support, be considered bad players)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(attention, be in other guys)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(mind, is guy)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(mind, is guy)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(attention, be in other guys)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(mind, have good guy)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(mind, have good guy)
...

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(attention, be in other guys)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(attention, be in other guys)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(attention, be in other guys)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(attention, be in other guys)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(attention, be in other guys)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(attention, be in other guys)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(attention, be in other guys)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(attention, be in other guys)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(concern, be for us)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(attention, be in other guys)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(support, be considered bad players)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(attention, be in other guys)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(mind, have guy)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(attention, be in other guys)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(mind, is guy)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(attention, be in other guys)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(mind, have good guy)
...