attorney: is general important

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents defense attorney
Weight: 0.74
, agent
Weight: 0.62
, office
Weight: 0.62
, witness
Weight: 0.61
Siblings partner
Weight: 0.65
, prosecutor
Weight: 0.62
, associate
Weight: 0.59
, paralegal
Weight: 0.57
, solicitor
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is general important 1.00
is general 0.95
general 0.94
general power of is pain 0.79
was general of india 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(attorney, is general important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(solicitor, was general of india)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(attorney, is general important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(solicitor, is general important)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(attorney, is general important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(solicitor, is general)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(attorney, is general important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(solicitor, is general important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(solicitor, is general important)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(attorney, is general important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(solicitor, is general) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(solicitor, is general)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(attorney, is general important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(solicitor, was general of india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(solicitor, was general of india)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(attorney, is general important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(attorney, is general important)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(attorney, is general important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(attorney, is general)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(attorney, is general important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(attorney, general)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(attorney, is general important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(attorney, general)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(attorney, is general important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(attorney, is general)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(attorney, is general important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(attorney, general)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(attorney, is general important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(attorney, is general)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(attorney, is general important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(attorney, general power of is pain)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(attorney, is general important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(attorney, is general)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(attorney, is general important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(attorney, general)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(attorney, is general important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(attorney, general power of is pain)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(attorney, is general important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(attorney, general power of is pain)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(attorney, is general important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(attorney, general power of is pain)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(attorney, is general important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(attorney, is general important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(attorney, is general important)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(attorney, is general important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(attorney, is general important)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(attorney, is general important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(solicitor, is general)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(attorney, is general important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(solicitor, is general important)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(attorney, is general important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(solicitor, was general of india)