auckland: be good place live

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents city
Weight: 0.60
, new zealand
Weight: 0.58
, place
Weight: 0.57
, town
Weight: 0.54
, port
Weight: 0.53
Siblings tasmania
Weight: 0.34
, adelaide
Weight: 0.34
, venice
Weight: 0.34
, perth
Weight: 0.34
, brisbane
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good place live 1.00
be best place live 0.95
be best city live in 0.86
be best city live 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(auckland, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(adelaide, be good place live)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(auckland, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(brisbane, be good place live)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(auckland, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(adelaide, be best place live)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(auckland, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(perth, be good place live)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(auckland, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(adelaide, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(adelaide, be good place live)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(auckland, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(brisbane, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(brisbane, be good place live)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(auckland, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(perth, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(perth, be good place live)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(auckland, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(adelaide, be best place live)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(adelaide, be best place live)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(auckland, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(auckland, be good place live)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(auckland, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(auckland, be best place live)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(auckland, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(auckland, be best place live)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(auckland, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(auckland, be best place live)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(auckland, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(auckland, be best place live)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(auckland, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(auckland, be best city live in)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(auckland, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(auckland, be best city live)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(auckland, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(auckland, be best city live)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(auckland, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(auckland, be best city live in)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(auckland, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(auckland, be best city live in)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(auckland, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(auckland, be best city live in)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(auckland, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(auckland, be best city live)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(auckland, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(auckland, be best city live)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(auckland, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(auckland, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(auckland, be good place live)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(auckland, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(auckland, be good place live)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(auckland, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(brisbane, be good place live)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(auckland, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(adelaide, be good place live)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(auckland, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(adelaide, be best place live)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(auckland, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(perth, be good place live)