auckland: be best city live in

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents city
Weight: 0.60
, new zealand
Weight: 0.58
, place
Weight: 0.57
, town
Weight: 0.54
, port
Weight: 0.53
Siblings tasmania
Weight: 0.34
, adelaide
Weight: 0.34
, venice
Weight: 0.34
, perth
Weight: 0.34
, brisbane
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be best city live in 1.00
be best city live 1.00
be best place live 0.90
is great city 0.86
be good place live 0.86
is city 0.83
be called city 0.81
is most liveable city 0.81
is liveable city 0.79
be known as city 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(city, is city)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(auckland, be best city live in)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(auckland, be best city live in)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(city, is city)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(auckland, be best city live in)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(city, is city)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(auckland, be best city live in)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(adelaide, be called city)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(auckland, be best city live in)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(adelaide, be best place live)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(auckland, be best city live in)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(adelaide, be good place live)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(auckland, be best city live in)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(brisbane, be good place live)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(auckland, be best city live in)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(brisbane, is liveable city)
...

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(city, is city)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(auckland, be best city live in)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(auckland, be best city live in)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(auckland, be best city live in)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(brisbane, is city)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(brisbane, is city)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(auckland, be best city live in)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(adelaide, be best place live)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(adelaide, be best place live)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(auckland, be best city live in)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(adelaide, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(adelaide, be good place live)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(auckland, be best city live in)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(brisbane, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(brisbane, be good place live)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(auckland, be best city live in)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(adelaide, be called city)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(adelaide, be called city)
...

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(auckland, be best city live in)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(auckland, be best city live in)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(auckland, be best city live in)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(auckland, be best city live)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(auckland, be best city live in)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(auckland, is city)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(auckland, be best city live in)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(auckland, be best city live)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(auckland, be best city live in)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(auckland, be called city)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(auckland, be best city live in)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(auckland, is city)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(auckland, be best city live in)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(auckland, be best city live in)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(auckland, be best city live in)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(auckland, be best city live in)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(auckland, be best city live in)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(auckland, be best city live in)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(city, is city)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(auckland, be best city live in)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(brisbane, is city)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(auckland, be best city live in)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(adelaide, be called city)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(auckland, be best city live in)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(brisbane, be good place live)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(auckland, be best city live in)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(adelaide, be good place live)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(auckland, be best city live in)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(brisbane, is liveable city)
...

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(auckland, be best city live in)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(city, is city)