auckland: is public transport

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents city
Weight: 0.60
, new zealand
Weight: 0.58
, place
Weight: 0.57
, town
Weight: 0.54
, port
Weight: 0.53
Siblings tasmania
Weight: 0.34
, adelaide
Weight: 0.34
, venice
Weight: 0.34
, perth
Weight: 0.34
, brisbane
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is public transport 1.00
is public transport bad 0.97
has state transport 0.92
is transport bad 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(auckland, is public transport)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(auckland, is public transport)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(auckland, is public transport)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(auckland, is public transport bad)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(auckland, is public transport)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(auckland, has state transport)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(auckland, is public transport)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(auckland, is transport bad)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(auckland, is public transport)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(auckland, has state transport)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(auckland, is public transport)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(auckland, has state transport)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(auckland, is public transport)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(auckland, has state transport)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(auckland, is public transport)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(auckland, is transport bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(auckland, is public transport)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(auckland, is public transport bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(auckland, is public transport)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(auckland, is transport bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(auckland, is public transport)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(auckland, is public transport bad)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(auckland, is public transport)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(auckland, is transport bad)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(auckland, is public transport)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(auckland, is public transport bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(auckland, is public transport)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(auckland, is public transport)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(auckland, is public transport)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(auckland, is public transport)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(auckland, is public transport)