auckland: is transport bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents city
Weight: 0.60
, new zealand
Weight: 0.58
, place
Weight: 0.57
, town
Weight: 0.54
, port
Weight: 0.53
Siblings tasmania
Weight: 0.34
, adelaide
Weight: 0.34
, venice
Weight: 0.34
, perth
Weight: 0.34
, brisbane
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is transport bad 1.00
is public transport bad 0.94
has state transport 0.91
is public transport 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(auckland, is transport bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(auckland, is transport bad)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(auckland, is transport bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(auckland, has state transport)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(auckland, is transport bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(auckland, is public transport)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(auckland, is transport bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(auckland, has state transport)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(auckland, is transport bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(auckland, is public transport)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(auckland, is transport bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(auckland, is public transport bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(auckland, is transport bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(auckland, is public transport bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(auckland, is transport bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(auckland, has state transport)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(auckland, is transport bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(auckland, is public transport bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(auckland, is transport bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(auckland, is public transport)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(auckland, is transport bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(auckland, is public transport bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(auckland, is transport bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(auckland, has state transport)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(auckland, is transport bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(auckland, is public transport)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(auckland, is transport bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(auckland, is transport bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(auckland, is transport bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(auckland, is transport bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(auckland, is transport bad)