aussies: is best dogs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents food
Weight: 0.40
, guy
Weight: 0.40
, rider
Weight: 0.40
, dog
Weight: 0.36
, everyone
Weight: 0.33
Siblings chinese food
Weight: 0.29
, jackson
Weight: 0.29
, mexican food
Weight: 0.29
, justin
Weight: 0.29
, johnson
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
is best dogs 1.00
is dogs 0.92
be with cats 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, is dogs)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(aussies, is best dogs)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(aussies, is best dogs)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(dog, is dogs)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(aussies, is best dogs)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, is dogs)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, is dogs)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(aussies, is best dogs)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(aussies, is best dogs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(aussies, is best dogs)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(aussies, is best dogs)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(aussies, is best dogs)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(aussies, be with cats)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(aussies, is best dogs)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(aussies, be with cats)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(aussies, is best dogs)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(aussies, be with cats)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(aussies, is best dogs)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(aussies, be with cats)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(aussies, is best dogs)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(aussies, is best dogs)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(aussies, is best dogs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(aussies, is best dogs)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(aussies, is best dogs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(aussies, is best dogs)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, is dogs)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(aussies, is best dogs)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, is dogs)