authorization: be possible in data processing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents approval
Weight: 0.69
, application
Weight: 0.66
, document
Weight: 0.64
, issue
Weight: 0.63
Siblings license
Weight: 0.60
, documentation
Weight: 0.34
, appropriation
Weight: 0.33
, resolution
Weight: 0.33
, justification
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be possible in data processing 1.00
be possible in electronic data processing 0.96
use data 0.85
consume data 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(document, use data) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(authorization, be possible in data processing)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(application, consume data) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(authorization, be possible in data processing)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(authorization, be possible in data processing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(document, use data)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(authorization, be possible in data processing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(application, consume data)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(authorization, be possible in data processing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(document, use data)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(authorization, be possible in data processing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(application, consume data)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(document, use data) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(authorization, be possible in data processing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(authorization, be possible in data processing)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(application, consume data) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(authorization, be possible in data processing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(authorization, be possible in data processing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(authorization, be possible in data processing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(authorization, be possible in data processing)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(authorization, be possible in data processing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(authorization, be possible in electronic data processing)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(authorization, be possible in data processing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(authorization, be possible in electronic data processing)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(authorization, be possible in data processing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(authorization, be possible in electronic data processing)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(authorization, be possible in data processing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(authorization, be possible in electronic data processing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(authorization, be possible in data processing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(authorization, be possible in data processing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(authorization, be possible in data processing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(authorization, be possible in data processing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(authorization, be possible in data processing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(authorization, be possible in data processing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(document, use data)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(authorization, be possible in data processing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(application, consume data)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(authorization, be possible in data processing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(document, use data)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(authorization, be possible in data processing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(application, consume data)