authorization: be possible in electronic data processing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents approval
Weight: 0.69
, application
Weight: 0.66
, document
Weight: 0.64
, issue
Weight: 0.63
Siblings license
Weight: 0.60
, documentation
Weight: 0.34
, appropriation
Weight: 0.33
, resolution
Weight: 0.33
, justification
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be possible in electronic data processing 1.00
be possible in data processing 0.96
use data 0.83
be necessary for software 0.76
consume data 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(document, use data) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(authorization, be possible in electronic data processing)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(application, consume data) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(authorization, be possible in electronic data processing)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(authorization, be possible in electronic data processing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(document, use data)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(authorization, be possible in electronic data processing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(application, consume data)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(authorization, be possible in electronic data processing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(document, use data)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(authorization, be possible in electronic data processing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(application, consume data)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(authorization, be possible in electronic data processing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(documentation, be necessary for software)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(document, use data) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(authorization, be possible in electronic data processing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(authorization, be possible in electronic data processing)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(application, consume data) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(authorization, be possible in electronic data processing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(authorization, be possible in electronic data processing)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(authorization, be possible in electronic data processing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(documentation, be necessary for software) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(documentation, be necessary for software)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(authorization, be possible in electronic data processing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(authorization, be possible in electronic data processing)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(authorization, be possible in electronic data processing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(authorization, be possible in data processing)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(authorization, be possible in electronic data processing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(authorization, be possible in data processing)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(authorization, be possible in electronic data processing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(authorization, be possible in data processing)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(authorization, be possible in electronic data processing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(authorization, be possible in data processing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(authorization, be possible in electronic data processing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(authorization, be possible in electronic data processing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(authorization, be possible in electronic data processing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(authorization, be possible in electronic data processing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(authorization, be possible in electronic data processing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(authorization, be possible in electronic data processing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(document, use data)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(authorization, be possible in electronic data processing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(application, consume data)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(authorization, be possible in electronic data processing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(documentation, be necessary for software)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(authorization, be possible in electronic data processing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(document, use data)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(authorization, be possible in electronic data processing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(application, consume data)