autism: be underdiagnosed in females

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mental disorder
Weight: 0.72
, mental health problem
Weight: 0.70
, mental illness
Weight: 0.70
, illness
Weight: 0.70
, personality disorder
Weight: 0.70
Siblings bipolar disorder
Weight: 0.39
, epilepsy
Weight: 0.38
, dyslexia
Weight: 0.38
, eating disorder
Weight: 0.37
, dementia
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be underdiagnosed in females 1.00
is underdiagnosed 0.97
be more prevalent in females 0.83
is overdiagnosed 0.81
affect more males than females 0.80
be more common in females 0.79
be more common in males 0.79
be more prevalent in young girls 0.78
be more prevalent in girls 0.77
more than males 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.09
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(personality disorder, be more common in males)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(autism, be underdiagnosed in females)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(personality disorder, be more common in females)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(autism, be underdiagnosed in females)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(autism, be underdiagnosed in females)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(personality disorder, be more common in females)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(autism, be underdiagnosed in females)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(personality disorder, be more common in males)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(autism, be underdiagnosed in females)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(personality disorder, be more common in females)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(autism, be underdiagnosed in females)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(personality disorder, be more common in males)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(autism, be underdiagnosed in females)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(epilepsy, be more common in males)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(autism, be underdiagnosed in females)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(dementia, be more common in females)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(autism, be underdiagnosed in females)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(eating disorder, is underdiagnosed)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(autism, be underdiagnosed in females)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(eating disorder, be more prevalent in females)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(autism, be underdiagnosed in females)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(eating disorder, be more prevalent in young girls)
...

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.21
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(personality disorder, be more common in males)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(autism, be underdiagnosed in females)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(autism, be underdiagnosed in females)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(personality disorder, be more common in females)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(autism, be underdiagnosed in females)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(autism, be underdiagnosed in females)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(autism, be underdiagnosed in females)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(eating disorder, is underdiagnosed)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(eating disorder, is underdiagnosed)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(autism, be underdiagnosed in females)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(bipolar disorder, is overdiagnosed)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(bipolar disorder, is overdiagnosed)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(autism, be underdiagnosed in females)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(eating disorder, be more prevalent in females)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(eating disorder, be more prevalent in females)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(autism, be underdiagnosed in females)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(eating disorder, more than males)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(eating disorder, more than males)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(autism, be underdiagnosed in females)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(eating disorder, be more common in females)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(eating disorder, be more common in females)
...

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(autism, be underdiagnosed in females)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(autism, be underdiagnosed in females)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(autism, be underdiagnosed in females)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(autism, affect more males than females)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(autism, be underdiagnosed in females)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(autism, affect more males than females)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(autism, be underdiagnosed in females)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(autism, affect more males than females)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(autism, be underdiagnosed in females)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(autism, affect more males than females)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(autism, be underdiagnosed in females)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(autism, be underdiagnosed in females)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(autism, be underdiagnosed in females)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(autism, be underdiagnosed in females)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(autism, be underdiagnosed in females)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(autism, be underdiagnosed in females)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(personality disorder, be more common in females)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(autism, be underdiagnosed in females)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(personality disorder, be more common in males)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(autism, be underdiagnosed in females)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(bipolar disorder, is overdiagnosed)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(autism, be underdiagnosed in females)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(eating disorder, is underdiagnosed)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(autism, be underdiagnosed in females)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(eating disorder, more than males)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(autism, be underdiagnosed in females)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(eating disorder, be more prevalent in girls)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(autism, be underdiagnosed in females)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(eating disorder, be more prevalent in females)
...

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(autism, be underdiagnosed in females)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(personality disorder, be more common in females)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(autism, be underdiagnosed in females)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(personality disorder, be more common in males)