eating disorder: is underdiagnosed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mental disorder
Weight: 0.86
, personality disorder
Weight: 0.83
, mental health problem
Weight: 0.74
, mental illness
Weight: 0.72
Siblings bulimia
Weight: 0.74
, overeating
Weight: 0.72
, obesity
Weight: 0.67
, depression
Weight: 0.65
, purging
Weight: 0.52

Related properties

Property Similarity
is underdiagnosed 1.00
be underdiagnosed in adults 0.96
be underdiagnosed in older adults 0.93
is overdiagnosed 0.82
be treatable 0.79
be considered curable disease 0.79
be in teenagers misdiagnosed 0.78
go undiagnosed 0.78
be considered chronic disease 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(mental illness, be treatable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(eating disorder, is underdiagnosed)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(eating disorder, is underdiagnosed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(mental illness, be treatable)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(eating disorder, is underdiagnosed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(mental illness, be treatable)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(eating disorder, is underdiagnosed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(depression, be underdiagnosed in older adults)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(eating disorder, is underdiagnosed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(depression, be in teenagers misdiagnosed)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(eating disorder, is underdiagnosed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(depression, be treatable)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(mental illness, be treatable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(eating disorder, is underdiagnosed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(eating disorder, is underdiagnosed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(eating disorder, is underdiagnosed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(depression, be underdiagnosed in older adults) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(depression, be underdiagnosed in older adults)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(eating disorder, is underdiagnosed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(depression, be treatable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(depression, be treatable)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(eating disorder, is underdiagnosed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(depression, be in teenagers misdiagnosed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(depression, be in teenagers misdiagnosed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(eating disorder, is underdiagnosed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(eating disorder, is underdiagnosed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(eating disorder, is underdiagnosed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(eating disorder, is underdiagnosed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(eating disorder, is underdiagnosed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(eating disorder, is underdiagnosed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(eating disorder, is underdiagnosed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(eating disorder, is underdiagnosed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(mental illness, be treatable)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(eating disorder, is underdiagnosed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(depression, be treatable)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(eating disorder, is underdiagnosed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(depression, be underdiagnosed in older adults)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(eating disorder, is underdiagnosed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(depression, be in teenagers misdiagnosed)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(eating disorder, is underdiagnosed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(mental illness, be treatable)