automobile: has physical part grooves

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents vehicle
Weight: 0.70
, industry
Weight: 0.62
, item
Weight: 0.62
, sector
Weight: 0.61
Siblings car
Weight: 0.74
, sedan
Weight: 0.46
, porsches
Weight: 0.40
, automobile industry
Weight: 0.40
, motorcycle
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part grooves 1.00
have deep grooves 0.92
has physical part horns 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(automobile, has physical part grooves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(car, has physical part horns)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(automobile, has physical part grooves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(car, has physical part horns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(car, has physical part horns)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(automobile, has physical part grooves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(automobile, has physical part grooves)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(automobile, has physical part grooves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(automobile, has physical part horns)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(automobile, has physical part grooves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(automobile, has physical part horns)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(automobile, has physical part grooves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(automobile, has physical part horns)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(automobile, has physical part grooves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(automobile, has physical part horns)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(automobile, has physical part grooves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(automobile, have deep grooves)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(automobile, has physical part grooves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(automobile, have deep grooves)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(automobile, has physical part grooves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(automobile, have deep grooves)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(automobile, has physical part grooves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(automobile, have deep grooves)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(automobile, has physical part grooves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(automobile, has physical part grooves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(automobile, has physical part grooves)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(automobile, has physical part grooves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(automobile, has physical part grooves)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(automobile, has physical part grooves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(car, has physical part horns)