average: has quality wrong

Related concepts

Parents	batting average Weight: 0.74 , indicator Weight: 0.68 , characteristic Weight: 0.59 , year Weight: 0.58
Siblings	arithmetic mean Weight: 0.59 , geometric mean Weight: 0.53 , chart Weight: 0.33 , volume Weight: 0.33 , fiscal year Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality wrong	1.00
has quality bad	0.87
has quality good	0.85
has quality better	0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(batting average, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Typical(average, has quality wrong)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(characteristic, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Typical(average, has quality wrong)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(average, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Plausible(characteristic, has quality good)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(average, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(batting average, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(average, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(batting average, has quality bad)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(average, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(characteristic, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(average, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(geometric mean, has quality better)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(average, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(fiscal year, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(batting average, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

Remarkable(average, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Plausible(average, has quality wrong)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(characteristic, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

Remarkable(average, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Plausible(average, has quality wrong)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(average, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(fiscal year, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Plausible(fiscal year, has quality good)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(average, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

Remarkable(geometric mean, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Plausible(geometric mean, has quality better)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(average, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Salient(average, has quality wrong)

Similarity expansion

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.24

Remarkable(average, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Remarkable(average, has quality bad)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.25

Salient(average, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Salient(average, has quality bad)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.53

Typical(average, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(average, has quality bad)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(average, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Plausible(average, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.25

Salient(average, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Typical(average, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(average, has quality wrong)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(average, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Typical(average, has quality wrong)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(average, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(characteristic, has quality good)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(average, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(batting average, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(average, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Typical(fiscal year, has quality good)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(average, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(geometric mean, has quality better)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.53

Typical(average, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(characteristic, has quality good)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.53

Typical(average, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(batting average, has quality bad)