back: has state pain

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents body part
Weight: 0.64
, side
Weight: 0.63
, part
Weight: 0.62
, hit
Weight: 0.59
Siblings down
Weight: 0.35
, out
Weight: 0.34
, big toe
Weight: 0.33
, away
Weight: 0.33
, here
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state pain 1.00
pain 0.93
is back pain 0.90
is chest pain 0.84
reason of is pain 0.84
is pain causes 0.82
has state sore 0.80
has state hurts 0.77
ache 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(side, is back pain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(back, has state pain)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(side, has state sore) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(back, has state pain)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(side, is chest pain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(back, has state pain)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(side, has state hurts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(back, has state pain)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(back, has state pain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(side, is chest pain)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(back, has state pain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(side, is back pain)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(back, has state pain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(side, has state hurts)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(back, has state pain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(side, has state sore)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(back, has state pain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(side, is back pain)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(back, has state pain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(side, is chest pain)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(back, has state pain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(side, has state sore)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(back, has state pain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(side, has state hurts)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(back, has state pain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(big toe, has state sore)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(side, is back pain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(back, has state pain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(back, has state pain)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(side, has state sore) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(back, has state pain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(back, has state pain)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(side, is chest pain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(back, has state pain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(back, has state pain)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(side, has state hurts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(back, has state pain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(back, has state pain)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(back, has state pain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(big toe, has state sore) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(big toe, has state sore)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(back, has state pain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(back, has state pain)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(back, has state pain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(back, pain)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(back, has state pain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(back, pain)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(back, has state pain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(back, pain)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(back, has state pain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(back, is pain causes)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(back, has state pain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(back, pain)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(back, has state pain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(back, has state pain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(back, has state pain)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(back, has state pain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(back, has state pain)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(back, has state pain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(side, is back pain)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(back, has state pain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(side, is chest pain)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(back, has state pain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(side, has state hurts)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(back, has state pain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(side, has state sore)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(back, has state pain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(big toe, has state sore)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(back, has state pain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(side, is back pain)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(back, has state pain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(side, is chest pain)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(back, has state pain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(side, has state hurts)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(back, has state pain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(side, has state sore)