side: has state hurts

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.63
, structure
Weight: 0.60
, direction
Weight: 0.59
, shape
Weight: 0.58
Siblings back
Weight: 0.63
, coleslaw
Weight: 0.59
, front
Weight: 0.57
, mountain pass
Weight: 0.46
, trapezium
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state hurts 1.00
hurts 0.97
hurt 0.82
hurt more 0.80
has state pain 0.77
has state sore 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(side, has state hurts)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(back, hurts)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(side, has state hurts)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(back, hurt)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(side, has state hurts)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(back, hurt more)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(side, has state hurts)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(back, has state pain)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(side, has state hurts)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(back, has state sore)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(side, has state hurts)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(back, hurts)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(back, hurts)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(side, has state hurts)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(back, hurt)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(back, hurt)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(side, has state hurts)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(back, hurt more)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(back, hurt more)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(side, has state hurts)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(back, has state pain)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(back, has state pain)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(side, has state hurts)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(back, has state sore)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(back, has state sore)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(side, has state hurts)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(side, has state hurts)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(side, has state hurts)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(side, hurt)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(side, has state hurts)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(side, hurt)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(side, has state hurts)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(side, hurt)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(side, has state hurts)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(side, hurt)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(side, has state hurts)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(side, has state sore)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(side, has state hurts)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(side, has state sore)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(side, has state hurts)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(side, has state sore)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(side, has state hurts)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(side, has state sore)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(side, has state hurts)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(side, has state hurts)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(side, has state hurts)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(side, has state hurts)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(side, has state hurts)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(side, has state hurts)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(back, hurts)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(side, has state hurts)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(back, hurt)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(side, has state hurts)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(back, hurt more)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(side, has state hurts)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(back, has state pain)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(side, has state hurts)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(back, has state sore)