back: hurt more

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents body part
Weight: 0.64
, side
Weight: 0.63
, part
Weight: 0.62
, hit
Weight: 0.59
Siblings down
Weight: 0.35
, out
Weight: 0.34
, big toe
Weight: 0.33
, away
Weight: 0.33
, here
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
hurt more 1.00
hurt 0.96
hurt eating 0.84
hurts 0.81
has state hurts 0.80
hurt during periods 0.79
is badly damaged 0.76
be are may injured 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(side, hurt)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(back, hurt more)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(side, has state hurts)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(back, hurt more)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(side, hurt eating)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(back, hurt more)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(part, be are may injured)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(back, hurt more)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(back, hurt more)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(side, hurt)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(back, hurt more)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(side, hurt eating)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(back, hurt more)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(side, has state hurts)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(back, hurt more)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(part, be are may injured)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(back, hurt more)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(side, hurt)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(back, hurt more)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(side, hurt eating)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(back, hurt more)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(part, be are may injured)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(back, hurt more)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(side, has state hurts)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(side, hurt)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(back, hurt more)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(back, hurt more)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(side, hurt eating)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(back, hurt more)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(back, hurt more)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(side, has state hurts)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(back, hurt more)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(back, hurt more)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(part, be are may injured)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(back, hurt more)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(back, hurt more)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(back, hurt more)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(back, hurt more)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(back, hurt more)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(back, hurt)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(back, hurt more)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(back, hurt)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(back, hurt more)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(back, hurt)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(back, hurt more)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(back, hurt)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(back, hurt more)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(back, hurt during periods)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(back, hurt more)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(back, hurt during periods)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(back, hurt more)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(back, hurt during periods)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(back, hurt more)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(back, hurts)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(back, hurt more)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(back, hurts)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(back, hurt more)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(back, hurts)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(back, hurt more)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(back, hurts)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(back, hurt more)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(back, hurt during periods)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(back, hurt more)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(back, hurt more)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(back, hurt more)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(back, hurt more)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(back, hurt more)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(back, hurt more)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(side, hurt)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(back, hurt more)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(side, hurt eating)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(back, hurt more)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(side, has state hurts)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(back, hurt more)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(part, be are may injured)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(back, hurt more)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(side, hurt)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(back, hurt more)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(side, hurt eating)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(back, hurt more)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(side, has state hurts)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(back, hurt more)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(part, be are may injured)