bacon: be bad for dogs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents flavor
Weight: 0.67
, meal
Weight: 0.67
, food
Weight: 0.63
, sandwich
Weight: 0.62
, product
Weight: 0.61
Siblings meat pie
Weight: 0.37
, fried egg
Weight: 0.36
, spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.36
, salad
Weight: 0.36
, sweet potato
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for dogs 1.00
be bad for cats 0.92
come from pigs 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(bacon, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, be bad for dogs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(bacon, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(sweet potato, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(sweet potato, be bad for dogs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(bacon, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(bacon, be bad for dogs)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(bacon, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(bacon, be bad for cats)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(bacon, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(bacon, be bad for cats)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(bacon, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(bacon, be bad for cats)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(bacon, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(bacon, be bad for cats)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(bacon, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(bacon, come from pigs)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(bacon, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(bacon, come from pigs)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(bacon, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(bacon, come from pigs)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(bacon, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(bacon, come from pigs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(bacon, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(bacon, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(bacon, be bad for dogs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(bacon, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(bacon, be bad for dogs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(bacon, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(sweet potato, be bad for dogs)