bad: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tv show
Weight: 0.65
, hit
Weight: 0.60
, television series
Weight: 0.55
, television show
Weight: 0.53
, protein
Weight: 0.52
Siblings big brother
Weight: 0.33
, talk show
Weight: 0.33
, cold case
Weight: 0.32
, big bang theory
Weight: 0.32
, game show
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality right 0.88
is quality 0.87
posturising bad 0.86
simply is bad 0.79
has quality influence 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(protein, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(bad, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(protein, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(bad, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(hit, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(bad, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(bad, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(protein, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(bad, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(hit, is quality)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(bad, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(protein, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(bad, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(protein, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(bad, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(protein, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(bad, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(hit, is quality)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(bad, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(talk show, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(bad, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(big brother, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(bad, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(big bang theory, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(protein, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(bad, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(bad, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(protein, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(bad, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(bad, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(hit, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(bad, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(bad, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(bad, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(big bang theory, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(big bang theory, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(bad, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(big brother, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(big brother, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(bad, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(talk show, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(talk show, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(bad, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(bad, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(bad, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(bad, has quality good)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(bad, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(bad, has quality good)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(bad, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(bad, has quality good)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(bad, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(bad, has quality good)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(bad, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(bad, has quality right)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(bad, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(bad, has quality right)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(bad, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(bad, has quality right)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(bad, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(bad, is quality)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(bad, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(bad, is quality)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(bad, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(bad, is quality)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(bad, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(bad, has quality right)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(bad, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(bad, is quality)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(bad, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(bad, has quality influence)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(bad, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(bad, has quality influence)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(bad, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(bad, has quality influence)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(bad, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(bad, has quality influence)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(bad, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(bad, posturising bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(bad, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(bad, posturising bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(bad, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(bad, posturising bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(bad, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(bad, posturising bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(bad, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(bad, simply is bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(bad, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(bad, simply is bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(bad, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(bad, simply is bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(bad, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(bad, simply is bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(bad, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(bad, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(bad, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(bad, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(bad, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(bad, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(protein, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(bad, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(hit, is quality)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(bad, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(protein, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(bad, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(talk show, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(bad, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(big bang theory, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(bad, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(big brother, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(bad, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(protein, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(bad, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(hit, is quality)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(bad, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(protein, has quality good)