badger: have fur

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.74
, species
Weight: 0.60
, predator
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.51
Siblings saber-toothed cat
Weight: 0.37
, red fox
Weight: 0.36
, guinea pig
Weight: 0.36
, cougar
Weight: 0.36
, beaver
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
have fur 1.00
have thick fur 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, have fur)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(badger, have fur)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(badger, have fur)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, have fur)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(badger, have fur)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, have fur)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(badger, have fur)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(beaver, have fur)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(badger, have fur)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have fur)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(badger, have fur)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(guinea pig, have fur)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(badger, have fur)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have thick fur)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, have fur)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(badger, have fur)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(badger, have fur)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(badger, have fur)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(guinea pig, have fur)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(guinea pig, have fur)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(badger, have fur)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(red fox, have fur)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(red fox, have fur)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(badger, have fur)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(beaver, have fur)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(beaver, have fur)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(badger, have fur)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(red fox, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(red fox, have thick fur)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(badger, have fur)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(badger, have fur)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(badger, have fur)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(badger, have thick fur)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(badger, have fur)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(badger, have thick fur)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(badger, have fur)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(badger, have thick fur)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(badger, have fur)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(badger, have thick fur)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(badger, have fur)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(badger, have fur)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(badger, have fur)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(badger, have fur)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(badger, have fur)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(badger, have fur)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, have fur)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(badger, have fur)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(red fox, have fur)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(badger, have fur)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(guinea pig, have fur)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(badger, have fur)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(beaver, have fur)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(badger, have fur)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(red fox, have thick fur)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(badger, have fur)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, have fur)