badger: have fur

Related concepts

Parents	animal Weight: 0.74 , species Weight: 0.60 , predator Weight: 0.59 , thing Weight: 0.51
Siblings	saber-toothed cat Weight: 0.37 , red fox Weight: 0.36 , guinea pig Weight: 0.36 , cougar Weight: 0.36 , beaver Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property	Similarity
have fur	1.00
have thick fur	0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 1.00

Plausible(animal, have fur) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Typical(badger, have fur)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.45

Plausible(badger, have fur) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Plausible(animal, have fur)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.50

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(badger, have fur) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Remarkable(animal, have fur)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(badger, have fur) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Remarkable(beaver, have fur)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(badger, have fur) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(red fox, have fur)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(badger, have fur) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(guinea pig, have fur)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(badger, have fur) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(red fox, have thick fur)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 1.00

Plausible(animal, have fur) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

Remarkable(badger, have fur) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Plausible(badger, have fur)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.45

Plausible(badger, have fur) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

Remarkable(guinea pig, have fur) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Plausible(guinea pig, have fur)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.45

Plausible(badger, have fur) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(red fox, have fur) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Plausible(red fox, have fur)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.45

Plausible(badger, have fur) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

Remarkable(beaver, have fur) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Plausible(beaver, have fur)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.45

Plausible(badger, have fur) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

Remarkable(red fox, have thick fur) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Plausible(red fox, have thick fur)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.45

Plausible(badger, have fur) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Salient(badger, have fur)

Similarity expansion

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.13

Remarkable(badger, have fur) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Remarkable(badger, have thick fur)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.45

Plausible(badger, have fur) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Plausible(badger, have thick fur)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.12

Salient(badger, have fur) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Salient(badger, have thick fur)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.25

Typical(badger, have fur) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(badger, have thick fur)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.12

Salient(badger, have fur) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Typical(badger, have fur) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(badger, have fur)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.45

Plausible(badger, have fur) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Typical(badger, have fur)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(badger, have fur) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Typical(animal, have fur)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(badger, have fur) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(red fox, have fur)

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(badger, have fur) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(guinea pig, have fur)

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(badger, have fur) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Typical(beaver, have fur)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(badger, have fur) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Typical(red fox, have thick fur)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.12

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.25

Typical(badger, have fur) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Typical(animal, have fur)