red fox: have thick fur

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fox
Weight: 0.75
, animal
Weight: 0.72
, arctic fox
Weight: 0.71
, species
Weight: 0.69
, mammal
Weight: 0.67
Siblings red squirrel
Weight: 0.40
, gray fox
Weight: 0.39
, red panda
Weight: 0.38
, brown bear
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
have thick fur 1.00
have white fur 0.93
have fur 0.92
have red fur 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, have fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(red fox, have thick fur)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(mammal, have fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(red fox, have thick fur)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(arctic fox, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(red fox, have thick fur)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(arctic fox, have fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(red fox, have thick fur)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(arctic fox, have white fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(red fox, have thick fur)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(fox, have fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(red fox, have thick fur)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(red fox, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(fox, have fur)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(red fox, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, have white fur)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(red fox, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, have fur)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(red fox, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, have thick fur)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(red fox, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(mammal, have fur)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(red fox, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, have fur)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have white fur)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have thick fur)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(fox, have fur)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(mammal, have fur)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have fur)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, have fur)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(red panda, have fur)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(brown bear, have fur)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(red squirrel, have fur)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(red panda, have red fur)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(red squirrel, have red fur)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(arctic fox, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(red fox, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(red fox, have thick fur)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, have fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(red fox, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(red fox, have thick fur)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(mammal, have fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(red fox, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(red fox, have thick fur)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(arctic fox, have fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(red fox, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(red fox, have thick fur)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(arctic fox, have white fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(red fox, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(red fox, have thick fur)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(fox, have fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(red fox, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(red fox, have thick fur)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(red fox, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(red squirrel, have fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(red squirrel, have fur)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(red fox, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(red squirrel, have red fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(red squirrel, have red fur)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(red fox, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(red panda, have red fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(red panda, have red fur)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(red fox, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(brown bear, have fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(brown bear, have fur)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(red fox, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(red panda, have fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(red panda, have fur)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(red fox, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(red fox, have thick fur)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(red fox, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(red fox, have white fur)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(red fox, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(red fox, have white fur)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(red fox, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have white fur)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(red fox, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(red fox, have red fur)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(red fox, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(red fox, have fur)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(red fox, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(red fox, have white fur)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(red fox, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(red fox, have fur)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(red fox, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(red fox, have red fur)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(red fox, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(red fox, have fur)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(red fox, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(red fox, have red fur)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(red fox, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have fur)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(red fox, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have red fur)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(red fox, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(red fox, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have thick fur)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(red fox, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(red fox, have thick fur)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have fur)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(fox, have fur)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have white fur)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have thick fur)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(mammal, have fur)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, have fur)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(red squirrel, have red fur)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(red squirrel, have fur)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(red panda, have red fur)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(brown bear, have fur)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(red panda, have fur)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(red fox, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have fur)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(red fox, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(fox, have fur)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(red fox, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have white fur)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(red fox, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have thick fur)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(red fox, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(mammal, have fur)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(red fox, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, have fur)