arctic fox: have thick fur

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wildlife
Weight: 0.74
, polar bear
Weight: 0.74
, predator
Weight: 0.73
, species
Weight: 0.71
Siblings red fox
Weight: 0.71
, fox
Weight: 0.39
, snowy owl
Weight: 0.38
, squirrel
Weight: 0.38
, gray fox
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
have thick fur 1.00
have white fur 0.93
have fur 0.92
have long fur 0.92
change fur color 0.87
have thickly furred footpads 0.80
have furry coats 0.80
have coats 0.76
have thick foot pads 0.76
have furred footpads 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(polar bear, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have thick fur)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(polar bear, have fur)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have thick fur)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(polar bear, have fur)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have thick fur)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(polar bear, have white fur)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have thick fur)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(arctic fox, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(polar bear, have thick fur)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(arctic fox, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(polar bear, have white fur)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(arctic fox, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(polar bear, have fur)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(arctic fox, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(polar bear, have fur)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, have thick fur)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, have white fur)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, have fur)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, have fur)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have white fur)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have thick fur)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(fox, have fur)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, have fur)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have fur)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(polar bear, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(arctic fox, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, have thick fur)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(polar bear, have fur)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(arctic fox, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, have thick fur)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(polar bear, have fur)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(arctic fox, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, have thick fur)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(polar bear, have white fur)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(arctic fox, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, have thick fur)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(arctic fox, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(red fox, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(red fox, have thick fur)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(arctic fox, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(red fox, have white fur)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(red fox, have white fur)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(arctic fox, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(red fox, have fur)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(red fox, have fur)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(arctic fox, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(fox, have fur)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(fox, have fur)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(arctic fox, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(squirrel, have fur)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(squirrel, have fur)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(arctic fox, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(arctic fox, have thick fur)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(arctic fox, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have fur)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(arctic fox, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, change fur color)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(arctic fox, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(arctic fox, have white fur)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(arctic fox, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(arctic fox, change fur color)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(arctic fox, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have white fur)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(arctic fox, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, have white fur)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(arctic fox, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, have fur)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(arctic fox, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, change fur color)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(arctic fox, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(arctic fox, change fur color)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(arctic fox, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have white fur)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(arctic fox, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have long fur)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(arctic fox, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, have thickly furred footpads)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(arctic fox, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(arctic fox, have fur)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(arctic fox, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(arctic fox, have thickly furred footpads)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(arctic fox, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have thickly furred footpads)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(arctic fox, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have thickly furred footpads)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(arctic fox, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, have long fur)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(arctic fox, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(arctic fox, have thick foot pads)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(arctic fox, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, have thick foot pads)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(arctic fox, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have thick foot pads)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(arctic fox, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(arctic fox, have long fur)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(arctic fox, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have thick foot pads)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(arctic fox, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have furred footpads)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(arctic fox, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have furry coats)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(arctic fox, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have long fur)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(arctic fox, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have coats)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(arctic fox, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, have furred footpads)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(arctic fox, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(arctic fox, have furred footpads)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(arctic fox, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, have coats)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(arctic fox, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have furred footpads)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(arctic fox, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have coats)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(arctic fox, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, have furry coats)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(arctic fox, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(arctic fox, have coats)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(arctic fox, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(arctic fox, have furry coats)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(arctic fox, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have furry coats)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(arctic fox, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have fur)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(arctic fox, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have thick fur)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(arctic fox, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have thick fur)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(polar bear, have white fur)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(polar bear, have thick fur)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(polar bear, have fur)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(polar bear, have fur)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(red fox, have fur)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(red fox, have white fur)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(red fox, have thick fur)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(fox, have fur)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(squirrel, have fur)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(arctic fox, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(polar bear, have thick fur)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(arctic fox, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(polar bear, have white fur)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(arctic fox, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(polar bear, have fur)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(arctic fox, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(polar bear, have fur)