polar bear: have thick fur

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bear
Weight: 0.79
, brown bear
Weight: 0.75
, mammal
Weight: 0.75
, wild animal
Weight: 0.72
, arctic
Weight: 0.72
Siblings arctic fox
Weight: 0.74
, black bear
Weight: 0.41
, grizzly bear
Weight: 0.39
, panda bear
Weight: 0.38
, moose
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
have thick fur 1.00
have thick white fur 0.98
have white fur 0.93
have fur 0.92
have long fur 0.92
have color fur 0.91
need fur 0.90
have white body fur 0.90
have clear fur 0.90
have oily fur 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(mammal, have fur)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(polar bear, have thick fur)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(mammal, need fur)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(polar bear, have thick fur)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(bear, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(polar bear, have thick fur)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(bear, need fur)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(polar bear, have thick fur)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(bear, have white fur)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(polar bear, have thick fur)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(bear, have fur)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(polar bear, have thick fur)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(brown bear, have fur)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(polar bear, have thick fur)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(polar bear, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(brown bear, have fur)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(polar bear, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(bear, have fur)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(polar bear, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(bear, have thick fur)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(polar bear, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(bear, have white fur)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(polar bear, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(bear, need fur)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(polar bear, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(mammal, have fur)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(polar bear, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(mammal, need fur)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(bear, have thick fur)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(bear, have white fur)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(mammal, have fur)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(mammal, need fur)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(brown bear, have fur)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(bear, have fur)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(bear, need fur)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(grizzly bear, have thick fur)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have thick fur)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(grizzly bear, have fur)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have white fur)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(panda bear, have fur)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have long fur)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have fur)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(bear, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(polar bear, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(polar bear, have thick fur)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(mammal, have fur)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(polar bear, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(polar bear, have thick fur)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(mammal, need fur)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(polar bear, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(polar bear, have thick fur)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(bear, have white fur)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(polar bear, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(polar bear, have thick fur)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(bear, need fur)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(polar bear, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(polar bear, have thick fur)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(bear, have fur)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(polar bear, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(polar bear, have thick fur)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(brown bear, have fur)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(polar bear, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(polar bear, have thick fur)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(polar bear, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(grizzly bear, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(grizzly bear, have thick fur)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(polar bear, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(grizzly bear, have fur)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(grizzly bear, have fur)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(polar bear, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(arctic fox, have fur)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, have fur)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(polar bear, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(arctic fox, have white fur)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, have white fur)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(polar bear, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(panda bear, have fur)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(panda bear, have fur)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(polar bear, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(arctic fox, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, have thick fur)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(polar bear, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(arctic fox, have long fur)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, have long fur)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(polar bear, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(polar bear, have thick fur)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(polar bear, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(polar bear, have white fur)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(polar bear, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, have white fur)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(polar bear, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(polar bear, have white fur)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(polar bear, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(polar bear, have fur)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(polar bear, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(polar bear, have white fur)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(polar bear, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(polar bear, have fur)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(polar bear, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(polar bear, have fur)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(polar bear, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, have fur)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(polar bear, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(polar bear, have fur)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(polar bear, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, have fur)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(polar bear, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(polar bear, have fur)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(polar bear, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(polar bear, have fur)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(polar bear, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(polar bear, need fur)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(polar bear, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(polar bear, need fur)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(polar bear, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(polar bear, need fur)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(polar bear, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, need fur)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(polar bear, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(polar bear, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, have thick fur)

Typical implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(polar bear, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(polar bear, have thick fur)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(brown bear, have fur)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(bear, have thick fur)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(bear, have fur)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(mammal, have fur)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(mammal, need fur)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(bear, need fur)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(bear, have white fur)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(grizzly bear, have thick fur)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(panda bear, have fur)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(grizzly bear, have fur)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have fur)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have thick fur)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have white fur)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have long fur)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(polar bear, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(brown bear, have fur)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(polar bear, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(bear, have fur)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(polar bear, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(mammal, have fur)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(polar bear, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(bear, have thick fur)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(polar bear, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(mammal, need fur)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(polar bear, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(bear, need fur)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(polar bear, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(bear, have white fur)