bear: have thick fur

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.69
, dog
Weight: 0.68
, wild animal
Weight: 0.66
, carnivore
Weight: 0.64
Siblings black bear
Weight: 0.86
, polar bear
Weight: 0.79
, giant panda
Weight: 0.60
, panda
Weight: 0.59
, koala
Weight: 0.51

Related properties

Property Similarity
have thick fur 1.00
have thick white fur 0.98
have brown fur 0.93
have white fur 0.93
have fur 0.92
have long fur 0.92
have color fur 0.91
need fur 0.90
have white body fur 0.90
have clear fur 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, have fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(bear, have thick fur)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(bear, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(dog, have fur)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(bear, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, have fur)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(bear, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, have thick fur)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(bear, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, have white fur)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(bear, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(panda, have fur)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(bear, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, have fur)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(bear, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(koala, have fur)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(bear, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, have fur)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(bear, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(panda, need fur)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(bear, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, need fur)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, have fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(bear, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(bear, have thick fur)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(bear, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(polar bear, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(polar bear, have thick fur)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(bear, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(polar bear, have white fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(polar bear, have white fur)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(bear, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(koala, have fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(koala, have fur)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(bear, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(polar bear, have fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(polar bear, have fur)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(bear, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(polar bear, have fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(polar bear, have fur)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(bear, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(polar bear, need fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(polar bear, need fur)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(bear, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(panda, have fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(panda, have fur)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(bear, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(panda, need fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(panda, need fur)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(bear, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(bear, have thick fur)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(bear, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(bear, have fur)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(bear, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(bear, need fur)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(bear, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(bear, have white fur)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(bear, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(bear, have white fur)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(bear, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(bear, have fur)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(bear, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(bear, have white fur)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(bear, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(bear, have white fur)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(bear, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(bear, need fur)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(bear, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(bear, have fur)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(bear, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(bear, need fur)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(bear, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(bear, have fur)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(bear, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(bear, need fur)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(bear, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(bear, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(bear, have thick fur)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(bear, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(bear, have thick fur)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(bear, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, have fur)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(bear, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(koala, have fur)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(bear, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(panda, have fur)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(bear, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(polar bear, have white fur)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(bear, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(polar bear, have thick fur)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(bear, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(panda, need fur)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(bear, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(polar bear, have fur)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(bear, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(polar bear, have fur)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(bear, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(polar bear, need fur)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(bear, have thick fur) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, have fur)