badger: hunt

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.74
, species
Weight: 0.60
, predator
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.51
Siblings saber-toothed cat
Weight: 0.37
, red fox
Weight: 0.36
, guinea pig
Weight: 0.36
, cougar
Weight: 0.36
, beaver
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
hunt 1.00
is hunted 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(species, hunt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(badger, hunt)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(predator, hunt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(badger, hunt)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(badger, hunt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(predator, hunt)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(badger, hunt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(species, hunt)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(badger, hunt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(species, hunt)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(badger, hunt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(predator, hunt)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(badger, hunt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(red fox, is hunted)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(badger, hunt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(cougar, is hunted)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(badger, hunt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(beaver, is hunted)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(species, hunt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(badger, hunt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(badger, hunt)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(predator, hunt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(badger, hunt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(badger, hunt)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(badger, hunt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(cougar, is hunted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(cougar, is hunted)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(badger, hunt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(beaver, is hunted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(beaver, is hunted)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(badger, hunt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(red fox, is hunted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(red fox, is hunted)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(badger, hunt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(badger, hunt)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(badger, hunt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(badger, is hunted)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(badger, hunt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(badger, is hunted)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(badger, hunt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(badger, is hunted)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(badger, hunt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(badger, is hunted)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(badger, hunt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(badger, hunt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(badger, hunt)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(badger, hunt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(badger, hunt)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(badger, hunt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(predator, hunt)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(badger, hunt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(species, hunt)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(badger, hunt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(cougar, is hunted)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(badger, hunt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(beaver, is hunted)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(badger, hunt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(red fox, is hunted)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(badger, hunt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(predator, hunt)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(badger, hunt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(species, hunt)