predator: hunt

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wild animal
Weight: 0.63
, thing
Weight: 0.59
, insect
Weight: 0.59
, movie
Weight: 0.58
, hazard
Weight: 0.58
Siblings grizzly bear
Weight: 0.75
, arctic fox
Weight: 0.73
, spider
Weight: 0.73
, beetle
Weight: 0.72
, owl
Weight: 0.71

Related properties

Property Similarity
hunt 1.00
be adapted hunt 0.86
hunt aliens 0.82
be adapted to hunting 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(predator, hunt)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(owl, hunt)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(predator, hunt)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(owl, hunt)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(owl, hunt)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(predator, hunt)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(predator, hunt)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(predator, hunt)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(predator, hunt aliens)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(predator, hunt)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(predator, be adapted hunt)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(predator, hunt)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(predator, be adapted hunt)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(predator, hunt)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(predator, hunt aliens)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(predator, hunt)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(predator, be adapted to hunting)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(predator, hunt)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(predator, be adapted hunt)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(predator, hunt)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(predator, be adapted to hunting)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(predator, hunt)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(predator, be adapted to hunting)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(predator, hunt)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(predator, hunt aliens)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(predator, hunt)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(predator, be adapted hunt)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(predator, hunt)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(predator, hunt aliens)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(predator, hunt)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(predator, be adapted to hunting)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(predator, hunt)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(predator, hunt)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(predator, hunt)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(predator, hunt)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(predator, hunt)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(predator, hunt)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(owl, hunt)