badminton: be best played indoor

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sport
Weight: 0.66
, game
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.56
, activity
Weight: 0.55
, event
Weight: 0.51
Siblings table tennis
Weight: 0.65
, tennis
Weight: 0.36
, tennis racket
Weight: 0.36
, snooker
Weight: 0.36
, squash
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be best played indoor 1.00
is indoor game 0.93
is indoor 0.91
is played indoors 0.85
be is played 0.80
be played 0.80
is played 0.80
being played 0.77
be better than tennis 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(game, is played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(badminton, be best played indoor)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(badminton, be best played indoor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(game, is played)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(badminton, be best played indoor) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(game, is played)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(badminton, be best played indoor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(table tennis, is indoor game)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(badminton, be best played indoor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tennis, be played)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(badminton, be best played indoor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(table tennis, be played)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(badminton, be best played indoor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(tennis, is played)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(game, is played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(badminton, be best played indoor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(badminton, be best played indoor)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(badminton, be best played indoor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(table tennis, is indoor game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(table tennis, is indoor game)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(badminton, be best played indoor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(table tennis, be played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(table tennis, be played)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(badminton, be best played indoor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(tennis, is played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(tennis, is played)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(badminton, be best played indoor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(tennis, be played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(tennis, be played)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(badminton, be best played indoor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(badminton, be best played indoor)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(badminton, be best played indoor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(badminton, is indoor game)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(badminton, be best played indoor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(badminton, is indoor)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(badminton, be best played indoor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(badminton, is indoor game)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(badminton, be best played indoor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(badminton, is indoor game)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(badminton, be best played indoor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(badminton, is indoor)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(badminton, be best played indoor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(badminton, is played indoors)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(badminton, be best played indoor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(badminton, is played indoors)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(badminton, be best played indoor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(badminton, is indoor)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(badminton, be best played indoor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(badminton, is played indoors)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(badminton, be best played indoor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(badminton, is played)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(badminton, be best played indoor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(badminton, be played)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(badminton, be best played indoor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(badminton, be is played)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(badminton, be best played indoor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(badminton, is played)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(badminton, be best played indoor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(badminton, be played)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(badminton, be best played indoor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(badminton, is played)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(badminton, be best played indoor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(badminton, be is played)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(badminton, be best played indoor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(badminton, be played)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(badminton, be best played indoor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(badminton, being played)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(badminton, be best played indoor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(badminton, be is played)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(badminton, be best played indoor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(badminton, being played)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(badminton, be best played indoor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(badminton, be better than tennis)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(badminton, be best played indoor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(badminton, being played)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(badminton, be best played indoor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(badminton, be better than tennis)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(badminton, be best played indoor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(badminton, be better than tennis)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(badminton, be best played indoor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(badminton, be better than tennis)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(badminton, be best played indoor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(badminton, is played indoors)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(badminton, be best played indoor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(badminton, is indoor)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(badminton, be best played indoor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(badminton, is indoor game)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(badminton, be best played indoor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(badminton, be is played)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(badminton, be best played indoor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(badminton, be played)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(badminton, be best played indoor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(badminton, is played)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(badminton, be best played indoor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(badminton, being played)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(badminton, be best played indoor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(badminton, be best played indoor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(badminton, be best played indoor)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(badminton, be best played indoor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(badminton, be best played indoor)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(badminton, be best played indoor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(game, is played)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(badminton, be best played indoor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(tennis, is played)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(badminton, be best played indoor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(table tennis, be played)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(badminton, be best played indoor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(tennis, be played)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(badminton, be best played indoor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(table tennis, is indoor game)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(badminton, be best played indoor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(game, is played)