tennis: be played

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents water sport
Weight: 0.64
, sport
Weight: 0.63
, hobby
Weight: 0.62
, swimming pool
Weight: 0.62
, ball
Weight: 0.60
Siblings table tennis
Weight: 0.75
, tennis ball
Weight: 0.39
, tennis racket
Weight: 0.38
, tennis court
Weight: 0.37
, tennis player
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be played 1.00
is played 0.99
was played 0.98
be how played 0.88
is play 0.86
was played long ago 0.84
be played on different surfaces 0.83
be played in india 0.82
be played on clay 0.79
be played in silence 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(sport, is play)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(tennis, be played)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(tennis, be played)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(sport, is play)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tennis, be played)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(sport, is play)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tennis, be played)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(table tennis, be played)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(sport, is play)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(tennis, be played)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(tennis, be played)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(tennis, be played)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(table tennis, be played)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(table tennis, be played)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(tennis, be played)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(tennis, be played)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(tennis, be played)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(tennis, is played)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(tennis, be played)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(tennis, is played)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(tennis, be played)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(tennis, was played)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(tennis, be played)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(tennis, is played)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(tennis, be played)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(tennis, was played long ago)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(tennis, be played)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(tennis, is played)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(tennis, be played)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(tennis, be played in silence)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(tennis, be played)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(tennis, be how played)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(tennis, be played)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(tennis, was played)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(tennis, be played)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(tennis, was played long ago)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(tennis, be played)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(tennis, be played in silence)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(tennis, be played)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(tennis, is play)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(tennis, be played)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(tennis, was played)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(tennis, be played)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(tennis, be played in india)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(tennis, be played)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(tennis, was played)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(tennis, be played)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(tennis, is play)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(tennis, be played)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(tennis, be played in silence)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(tennis, be played)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(tennis, is play)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(tennis, be played)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(tennis, is play)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(tennis, be played)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(tennis, was played long ago)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(tennis, be played)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(tennis, be how played)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(tennis, be played)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(tennis, be how played)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(tennis, be played)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(tennis, be how played)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(tennis, be played)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(tennis, be played in silence)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(tennis, be played)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(tennis, be played in india)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(tennis, be played)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(tennis, was played long ago)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(tennis, be played)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(tennis, be played in india)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(tennis, be played)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(tennis, be played in india)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(tennis, be played)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(tennis, be played)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tennis, be played)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(tennis, be played)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(tennis, be played)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tennis, be played)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(sport, is play)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tennis, be played)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(table tennis, be played)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(tennis, be played)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(sport, is play)