bag: be more used than other type

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents shopping bag
Weight: 0.78
, kit
Weight: 0.62
, item
Weight: 0.59
, handbag
Weight: 0.57
Siblings trash bag
Weight: 0.73
, suitcase
Weight: 0.68
, purse
Weight: 0.68
, shoulder bag
Weight: 0.68
, carrier bag
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more used than other type 1.00
be more used than type 0.99
be more used than other type of bag 0.92
be more used than type of bag 0.89
have more expensive than in 1933 today 0.84
be less rare than common ones 0.84
be less rare than ones 0.83
get more expensive 0.82
has one use 0.80
cost more than new cars 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(bag, be more used than other type)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(handbag, cost more than new cars)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(bag, be more used than other type)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(bag, be more used than other type)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(handbag, cost more than new cars)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(bag, be more used than other type)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(bag, be more used than other type)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(handbag, cost more than new cars)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(bag, be more used than other type)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(bag, be more used than other type)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(bag, be more used than other type)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(handbag, cost more than new cars)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(bag, be more used than other type)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(bag, be more used than other type)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(bag, be more used than other type)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(bag, be more used than other type)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(bag, be more used than other type)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(bag, be more used than type)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(bag, be more used than other type)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(bag, be more used than other type of bag)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(bag, be more used than other type)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(bag, be more used than type of bag)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(bag, be more used than other type)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(bag, be more used than type)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(bag, be more used than other type)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(bag, be more used than type)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(bag, be more used than other type)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(bag, be more used than other type)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(bag, be more used than other type)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(bag, be more used than other type)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(bag, be more used than other type)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(bag, be more used than other type)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(handbag, cost more than new cars)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(bag, be more used than other type)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(bag, be more used than other type)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(handbag, cost more than new cars)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(bag, be more used than other type)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)