item: have more expensive than in 1933 today

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents artifact
Weight: 0.67
, element
Weight: 0.65
, piece
Weight: 0.61
, clue
Weight: 0.60
Siblings line item
Weight: 0.79
, movie ticket
Weight: 0.72
, shopping bag
Weight: 0.71
, kitchen utensil
Weight: 0.71
, postage stamp
Weight: 0.71

Related properties

Property Similarity
have more expensive than in 1933 today 1.00
get more expensive 0.93
be much more costly today 0.90
be less rare than ones 0.85
get expensive 0.84
be in stores more costly today 0.84
be cheaper online than than store 0.84
is expensive 0.84
cost more 0.83
be on cheaper 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(postage stamp, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(movie ticket, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(movie ticket, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(movie ticket, is expensive)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(postage stamp, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(postage stamp, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(item, be much more costly today)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(item, be much more costly today)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(item, be much more costly today)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(item, be cheaper online than than store)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(item, is expensive)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(item, be cheaper online than than store)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(item, is expensive)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(item, be cheaper online than than store)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(item, is expensive)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(item, be much more costly today)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(item, is expensive)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(item, be cheaper online than than store)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(postage stamp, is expensive)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(movie ticket, is expensive)