item: be much more costly today

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents artifact
Weight: 0.67
, element
Weight: 0.65
, piece
Weight: 0.61
, clue
Weight: 0.60
Siblings line item
Weight: 0.79
, movie ticket
Weight: 0.72
, shopping bag
Weight: 0.71
, kitchen utensil
Weight: 0.71
, postage stamp
Weight: 0.71

Related properties

Property Similarity
be much more costly today 1.00
have more expensive than in 1933 today 0.90
get more expensive 0.89
be in stores more costly today 0.89
be in stores more costly 0.87
be in stores costly today 0.86
get expensive 0.85
is expensive 0.84
be in stores costly 0.83
cost more 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(item, be much more costly today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(postage stamp, is expensive)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(item, be much more costly today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(movie ticket, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(item, be much more costly today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(movie ticket, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(movie ticket, is expensive)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(item, be much more costly today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(postage stamp, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(postage stamp, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(item, be much more costly today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(item, be much more costly today)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(item, be much more costly today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(item, be much more costly today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(item, be much more costly today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(item, is expensive)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(item, be much more costly today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(item, is expensive)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(item, be much more costly today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(item, be much more costly today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(item, be much more costly today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(item, be much more costly today)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(item, be much more costly today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(item, be much more costly today)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(item, be much more costly today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(postage stamp, is expensive)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(item, be much more costly today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(movie ticket, is expensive)