postage stamp: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents stamp
Weight: 0.74
, item
Weight: 0.71
, document
Weight: 0.62
, material
Weight: 0.60
Siblings rubber stamp
Weight: 0.37
, junk mail
Weight: 0.35
, cardboard box
Weight: 0.35
, line item
Weight: 0.35
, business card
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00
get expensive 0.94
get more expensive 0.90
be in market expensive 0.86
is cheaper 0.85
be much more costly today 0.84
have more expensive than in 1933 today 0.84
be on cheaper 0.83
be sold cheaper 0.81
is overpriced now 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(item, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(postage stamp, is expensive)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(stamp, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(postage stamp, is expensive)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(postage stamp, is expensive)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(item, be much more costly today)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(postage stamp, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(postage stamp, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(stamp, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(postage stamp, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(item, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(postage stamp, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(item, be much more costly today)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(postage stamp, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(postage stamp, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(stamp, is expensive)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(postage stamp, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(item, is expensive)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(postage stamp, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(postage stamp, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(item, be much more costly today)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(postage stamp, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(cardboard box, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(postage stamp, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(rubber stamp, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(item, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(postage stamp, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(postage stamp, is expensive)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(stamp, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(postage stamp, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(postage stamp, is expensive)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(postage stamp, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(postage stamp, is expensive)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(item, be much more costly today)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(postage stamp, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(postage stamp, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(postage stamp, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(rubber stamp, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(rubber stamp, is expensive)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(postage stamp, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(cardboard box, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(cardboard box, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(postage stamp, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(postage stamp, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(postage stamp, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(postage stamp, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(postage stamp, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(postage stamp, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(postage stamp, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(postage stamp, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(item, be much more costly today)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(postage stamp, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(item, is expensive)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(postage stamp, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(stamp, is expensive)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(postage stamp, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(postage stamp, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(cardboard box, is expensive)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(postage stamp, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(rubber stamp, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(postage stamp, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(item, is expensive)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(postage stamp, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(stamp, is expensive)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(postage stamp, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(item, be much more costly today)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(postage stamp, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)