bagel: is partially cut

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents food
Weight: 0.65
, snack
Weight: 0.63
, item
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.56
, product
Weight: 0.56
Siblings sandwich
Weight: 0.36
, meat pie
Weight: 0.36
, muffin
Weight: 0.35
, burrito
Weight: 0.35
, hamburger
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is partially cut 1.00
is cut through 0.81
has state cut 0.81
be cut way 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(bagel, is partially cut)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, has state cut)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(bagel, is partially cut)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(sandwich, has state cut)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(sandwich, has state cut)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(bagel, is partially cut)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(bagel, is partially cut)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(bagel, is partially cut)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(bagel, has state cut)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(bagel, is partially cut)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(bagel, is cut through)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(bagel, is partially cut)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(bagel, has state cut)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(bagel, is partially cut)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(bagel, is cut through)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(bagel, is partially cut)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(bagel, is cut through)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(bagel, is partially cut)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(bagel, is cut through)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(bagel, is partially cut)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(bagel, has state cut)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(bagel, is partially cut)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(bagel, has state cut)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(bagel, is partially cut)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(bagel, be cut way)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(bagel, is partially cut)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(bagel, be cut way)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(bagel, is partially cut)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(bagel, be cut way)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(bagel, is partially cut)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(bagel, be cut way)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(bagel, is partially cut)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(bagel, is partially cut)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(bagel, is partially cut)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(bagel, is partially cut)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(bagel, is partially cut)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(bagel, is partially cut)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(sandwich, has state cut)