sandwich: has state cut

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dish
Weight: 0.67
, snack
Weight: 0.66
, meal
Weight: 0.64
, item
Weight: 0.63
Siblings breakfast
Weight: 0.69
, cheeseburger
Weight: 0.68
, burrito
Weight: 0.66
, taco
Weight: 0.65
, dessert
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state cut 1.00
cut in half 0.85
taste cut in half 0.80
cut taste 0.80
taste cut 0.80
taste better cut 0.79
cut taste better 0.79
has state last 0.78
be on wheels cut 0.77
taste cut into quarters 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(meal, has state last)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(sandwich, has state cut)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(meal, be on wheels cut)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(sandwich, has state cut)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(sandwich, has state cut)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(meal, be on wheels cut)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(sandwich, has state cut)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(meal, has state last)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, has state cut)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(meal, be on wheels cut)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, has state cut)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(meal, has state last)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, has state cut)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(dessert, has state last)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(meal, has state last)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(sandwich, has state cut)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(sandwich, has state cut)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(meal, be on wheels cut)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(sandwich, has state cut)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(sandwich, has state cut)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(sandwich, has state cut)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(dessert, has state last)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(dessert, has state last)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(sandwich, has state cut)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(sandwich, has state cut)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(sandwich, has state cut)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, cut in half)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(sandwich, has state cut)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, taste cut)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(sandwich, has state cut)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, taste better cut)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(sandwich, has state cut)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(sandwich, cut in half)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(sandwich, has state cut)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(sandwich, taste cut)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(sandwich, has state cut)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(sandwich, taste cut)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(sandwich, has state cut)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(sandwich, taste better cut)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(sandwich, has state cut)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(sandwich, taste better cut)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(sandwich, has state cut)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(sandwich, taste cut)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(sandwich, has state cut)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(sandwich, taste better cut)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(sandwich, has state cut)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(sandwich, cut taste)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(sandwich, has state cut)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(sandwich, cut in half)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(sandwich, has state cut)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(sandwich, cut in half)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(sandwich, has state cut)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, cut taste)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(sandwich, has state cut)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sandwich, cut taste better)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(sandwich, has state cut)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(sandwich, taste cut into quarters)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(sandwich, has state cut)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, taste cut in half)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(sandwich, has state cut)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(sandwich, taste cut in half)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(sandwich, has state cut)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(sandwich, cut taste)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(sandwich, has state cut)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, cut taste better)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(sandwich, has state cut)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(sandwich, cut taste)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(sandwich, has state cut)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, taste cut into quarters)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(sandwich, has state cut)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(sandwich, taste cut into quarters)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(sandwich, has state cut)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(sandwich, cut taste better)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(sandwich, has state cut)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(sandwich, taste cut in half)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(sandwich, has state cut)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(sandwich, taste cut into quarters)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(sandwich, has state cut)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(sandwich, cut taste better)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(sandwich, has state cut)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(sandwich, taste cut in half)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(sandwich, has state cut)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(sandwich, has state cut)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, has state cut)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(sandwich, has state cut)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(sandwich, has state cut)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, has state cut)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(meal, be on wheels cut)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, has state cut)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(meal, has state last)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, has state cut)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(dessert, has state last)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(sandwich, has state cut)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(meal, be on wheels cut)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(sandwich, has state cut)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(meal, has state last)