sandwich: cut in half

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dish
Weight: 0.67
, snack
Weight: 0.66
, meal
Weight: 0.64
, item
Weight: 0.63
Siblings breakfast
Weight: 0.69
, cheeseburger
Weight: 0.68
, burrito
Weight: 0.66
, taco
Weight: 0.65
, dessert
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
cut in half 1.00
taste cut in half 0.92
has state cut 0.85
taste cut into quarters 0.83
cut taste 0.79
taste cut 0.79
taste better cut 0.78
cut taste better 0.78
be on wheels cut 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.16
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(meal, be on wheels cut)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(sandwich, cut in half)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(sandwich, cut in half)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(meal, be on wheels cut)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, cut in half)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(meal, be on wheels cut)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.20
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(meal, be on wheels cut)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(sandwich, cut in half)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(sandwich, cut in half)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(sandwich, cut in half)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(sandwich, cut in half)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(sandwich, cut in half)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, has state cut)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(sandwich, cut in half)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(sandwich, has state cut)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(sandwich, cut in half)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(sandwich, has state cut)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(sandwich, cut in half)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(sandwich, taste cut in half)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(sandwich, cut in half)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(sandwich, has state cut)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(sandwich, cut in half)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(sandwich, taste cut into quarters)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(sandwich, cut in half)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(sandwich, taste cut)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(sandwich, cut in half)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, taste cut in half)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(sandwich, cut in half)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(sandwich, taste better cut)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(sandwich, cut in half)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(sandwich, taste cut)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(sandwich, cut in half)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(sandwich, taste better cut)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(sandwich, cut in half)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(sandwich, cut taste)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(sandwich, cut in half)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(sandwich, taste cut)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(sandwich, cut in half)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(sandwich, taste better cut)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(sandwich, cut in half)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, taste better cut)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(sandwich, cut in half)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, taste cut)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(sandwich, cut in half)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sandwich, cut taste better)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(sandwich, cut in half)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(sandwich, taste cut in half)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(sandwich, cut in half)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(sandwich, taste cut into quarters)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(sandwich, cut in half)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(sandwich, cut taste)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(sandwich, cut in half)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, taste cut into quarters)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(sandwich, cut in half)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, cut taste)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(sandwich, cut in half)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(sandwich, cut taste)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(sandwich, cut in half)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(sandwich, taste cut into quarters)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(sandwich, cut in half)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(sandwich, cut taste better)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(sandwich, cut in half)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, cut taste better)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(sandwich, cut in half)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(sandwich, taste cut in half)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(sandwich, cut in half)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(sandwich, cut taste better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(sandwich, cut in half)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(sandwich, cut in half)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, cut in half)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(sandwich, cut in half)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(sandwich, cut in half)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, cut in half)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(meal, be on wheels cut)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(sandwich, cut in half)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(meal, be on wheels cut)