sandwich: cut taste better

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dish
Weight: 0.67
, snack
Weight: 0.66
, meal
Weight: 0.64
, item
Weight: 0.63
Siblings breakfast
Weight: 0.69
, cheeseburger
Weight: 0.68
, burrito
Weight: 0.66
, taco
Weight: 0.65
, dessert
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
taste better cut 1.00
cut taste better 1.00
cut taste 0.96
taste cut 0.96
taste cut in half 0.91
taste good 0.87
taste cut into quarters 0.84
taste better then healthier foods 0.83
taste better healthier foods 0.83
cut diagonally taste better 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, cut taste better)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(dessert, taste better healthier foods)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, cut taste better)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(cheeseburger, taste good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, cut taste better)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(dessert, taste good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, cut taste better)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(dessert, taste better then healthier foods)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(sandwich, cut taste better)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(dessert, taste good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(dessert, taste good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(sandwich, cut taste better)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(dessert, taste better then healthier foods)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(dessert, taste better then healthier foods)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(sandwich, cut taste better)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(cheeseburger, taste good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(cheeseburger, taste good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(sandwich, cut taste better)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(dessert, taste better healthier foods)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(dessert, taste better healthier foods)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(sandwich, cut taste better)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(sandwich, cut taste better)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(sandwich, cut taste better)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(sandwich, taste better cut)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(sandwich, cut taste better)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(sandwich, taste better cut)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(sandwich, cut taste better)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(sandwich, taste better cut)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(sandwich, cut taste better)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(sandwich, taste cut)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(sandwich, cut taste better)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, taste better cut)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(sandwich, cut taste better)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(sandwich, taste cut)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(sandwich, cut taste better)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(sandwich, taste cut)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(sandwich, cut taste better)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(sandwich, cut taste)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(sandwich, cut taste better)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, taste cut)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(sandwich, cut taste better)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(sandwich, cut taste)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(sandwich, cut taste better)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(sandwich, cut taste)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(sandwich, cut taste better)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, cut taste)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(sandwich, cut taste better)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(sandwich, taste cut in half)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(sandwich, cut taste better)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(sandwich, taste cut into quarters)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(sandwich, cut taste better)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, taste cut in half)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(sandwich, cut taste better)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(sandwich, taste good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(sandwich, cut taste better)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(sandwich, taste cut in half)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(sandwich, cut taste better)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(sandwich, taste cut in half)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(sandwich, cut taste better)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(sandwich, cut diagonally taste better)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(sandwich, cut taste better)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(sandwich, taste cut into quarters)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(sandwich, cut taste better)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(sandwich, taste cut into quarters)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(sandwich, cut taste better)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, taste cut into quarters)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(sandwich, cut taste better)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(sandwich, cut diagonally taste better)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(sandwich, cut taste better)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(sandwich, taste good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(sandwich, cut taste better)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(sandwich, cut diagonally taste better)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(sandwich, cut taste better)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(sandwich, taste good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(sandwich, cut taste better)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, cut diagonally taste better)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(sandwich, cut taste better)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, taste good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(sandwich, cut taste better)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sandwich, cut taste better)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, cut taste better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(sandwich, cut taste better)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sandwich, cut taste better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, cut taste better)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(dessert, taste better then healthier foods)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, cut taste better)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(dessert, taste better healthier foods)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, cut taste better)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(dessert, taste good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, cut taste better)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(cheeseburger, taste good)