sandwich: taste good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dish
Weight: 0.67
, snack
Weight: 0.66
, meal
Weight: 0.64
, item
Weight: 0.63
Siblings breakfast
Weight: 0.69
, cheeseburger
Weight: 0.68
, burrito
Weight: 0.66
, taco
Weight: 0.65
, dessert
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
taste good 1.00
taste better cut 0.87
cut taste better 0.87
cut taste 0.86
taste cut 0.86
taste foods 0.83
taste better then healthier foods 0.82
taste better healthier foods 0.82
taste then healthier foods 0.81
taste healthier foods 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, taste good)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(cheeseburger, taste good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, taste good)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(dessert, taste better healthier foods)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, taste good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(dessert, taste good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, taste good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(dessert, taste healthier foods)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, taste good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(dessert, taste better then healthier foods)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, taste good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(dessert, taste then healthier foods)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, taste good)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(dessert, taste foods)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(sandwich, taste good)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(dessert, taste good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(dessert, taste good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(sandwich, taste good)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(cheeseburger, taste good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(cheeseburger, taste good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(sandwich, taste good)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(dessert, taste foods)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(dessert, taste foods)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(sandwich, taste good)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(dessert, taste better then healthier foods)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(dessert, taste better then healthier foods)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(sandwich, taste good)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(dessert, taste then healthier foods)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(dessert, taste then healthier foods)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(sandwich, taste good)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(dessert, taste healthier foods)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(dessert, taste healthier foods)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(sandwich, taste good)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(dessert, taste better healthier foods)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(dessert, taste better healthier foods)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(sandwich, taste good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(sandwich, taste good)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(sandwich, taste good)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(sandwich, taste better cut)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(sandwich, taste good)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(sandwich, taste cut)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(sandwich, taste good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(sandwich, cut taste better)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(sandwich, taste good)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(sandwich, cut taste)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(sandwich, taste good)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(sandwich, taste better cut)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(sandwich, taste good)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(sandwich, taste better cut)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(sandwich, taste good)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(sandwich, taste cut)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(sandwich, taste good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sandwich, cut taste better)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(sandwich, taste good)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(sandwich, taste cut)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(sandwich, taste good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(sandwich, cut taste)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(sandwich, taste good)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, taste better cut)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(sandwich, taste good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(sandwich, cut taste better)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(sandwich, taste good)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(sandwich, cut taste)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(sandwich, taste good)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, taste cut)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(sandwich, taste good)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, cut taste)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(sandwich, taste good)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, cut taste better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(sandwich, taste good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(sandwich, taste good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, taste good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(sandwich, taste good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(sandwich, taste good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, taste good)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(dessert, taste foods)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, taste good)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(dessert, taste then healthier foods)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, taste good)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(dessert, taste healthier foods)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, taste good)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(dessert, taste better then healthier foods)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, taste good)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(dessert, taste better healthier foods)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, taste good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(dessert, taste good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, taste good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(cheeseburger, taste good)