dessert: taste healthier foods

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fruit salad
Weight: 0.75
, recipe
Weight: 0.64
, sandwich
Weight: 0.63
, entree
Weight: 0.61
Siblings tiramisu
Weight: 0.84
, chocolate cake
Weight: 0.79
, flan
Weight: 0.79
, custard
Weight: 0.76
, apple pie
Weight: 0.75

Related properties

Property Similarity
taste healthier foods 1.00
taste better healthier foods 0.99
taste then healthier foods 0.99
taste better then healthier foods 0.98
taste foods 0.94
is foods 0.90
is hazardous foods 0.81
taste good 0.81
taste 0.81
be considered as snack food 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(sandwich, taste good)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(dessert, taste healthier foods)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(sandwich, be considered as snack food)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(dessert, taste healthier foods)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(dessert, taste healthier foods)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(sandwich, be considered as snack food)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(dessert, taste healthier foods)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(sandwich, taste good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(dessert, taste healthier foods)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, taste good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(dessert, taste healthier foods)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, be considered as snack food)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(dessert, taste healthier foods)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(custard, taste)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(dessert, taste healthier foods)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(custard, is hazardous foods)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(dessert, taste healthier foods)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(custard, is foods)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(sandwich, taste good)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(dessert, taste healthier foods)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(dessert, taste healthier foods)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(sandwich, be considered as snack food)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(dessert, taste healthier foods)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(dessert, taste healthier foods)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(dessert, taste healthier foods)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(custard, is foods)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(custard, is foods)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(dessert, taste healthier foods)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(custard, is hazardous foods)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(custard, is hazardous foods)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(dessert, taste healthier foods)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(custard, taste)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(custard, taste)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(dessert, taste healthier foods)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(dessert, taste healthier foods)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(dessert, taste healthier foods)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(dessert, taste foods)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(dessert, taste healthier foods)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(dessert, taste better healthier foods)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(dessert, taste healthier foods)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(dessert, taste then healthier foods)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(dessert, taste healthier foods)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(dessert, taste foods)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(dessert, taste healthier foods)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(dessert, taste better then healthier foods)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(dessert, taste healthier foods)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(dessert, taste better healthier foods)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(dessert, taste healthier foods)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(dessert, taste then healthier foods)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(dessert, taste healthier foods)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(dessert, taste then healthier foods)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(dessert, taste healthier foods)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(dessert, taste then healthier foods)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(dessert, taste healthier foods)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(dessert, taste foods)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(dessert, taste healthier foods)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(dessert, taste better healthier foods)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(dessert, taste healthier foods)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(dessert, taste foods)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(dessert, taste healthier foods)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(dessert, taste better then healthier foods)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(dessert, taste healthier foods)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(dessert, taste better then healthier foods)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(dessert, taste healthier foods)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(dessert, taste better then healthier foods)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(dessert, taste healthier foods)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(dessert, taste better healthier foods)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(dessert, taste healthier foods)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(dessert, taste good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(dessert, taste healthier foods)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(dessert, taste good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(dessert, taste healthier foods)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(dessert, taste good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(dessert, taste healthier foods)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(dessert, taste good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(dessert, taste healthier foods)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(dessert, taste healthier foods)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(dessert, taste healthier foods)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(dessert, taste healthier foods)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(dessert, taste healthier foods)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(dessert, taste healthier foods)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(sandwich, be considered as snack food)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(dessert, taste healthier foods)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(sandwich, taste good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(dessert, taste healthier foods)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(custard, is foods)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(dessert, taste healthier foods)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(custard, is hazardous foods)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(dessert, taste healthier foods)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(custard, taste)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(dessert, taste healthier foods)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(sandwich, be considered as snack food)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(dessert, taste healthier foods)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(sandwich, taste good)