dessert: taste foods

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fruit salad
Weight: 0.75
, recipe
Weight: 0.64
, sandwich
Weight: 0.63
, entree
Weight: 0.61
Siblings tiramisu
Weight: 0.84
, chocolate cake
Weight: 0.79
, flan
Weight: 0.79
, custard
Weight: 0.76
, apple pie
Weight: 0.75

Related properties

Property Similarity
taste foods 1.00
is foods 0.94
taste healthier foods 0.94
taste then healthier foods 0.93
taste better healthier foods 0.91
taste better then healthier foods 0.90
taste 0.87
taste good 0.83
is hazardous foods 0.82
have ingredients 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(sandwich, taste good)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(dessert, taste foods)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(dessert, taste foods)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(sandwich, taste good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(dessert, taste foods)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, taste good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(dessert, taste foods)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(custard, taste)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(dessert, taste foods)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(custard, is hazardous foods)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(dessert, taste foods)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(custard, is foods)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(sandwich, taste good)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(dessert, taste foods)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(dessert, taste foods)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(dessert, taste foods)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(custard, is foods)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(custard, is foods)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(dessert, taste foods)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(custard, taste)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(custard, taste)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(dessert, taste foods)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(custard, is hazardous foods)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(custard, is hazardous foods)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(dessert, taste foods)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(dessert, taste foods)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(dessert, taste foods)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(dessert, taste healthier foods)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(dessert, taste foods)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(dessert, taste then healthier foods)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(dessert, taste foods)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(dessert, taste better healthier foods)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(dessert, taste foods)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(dessert, taste better then healthier foods)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(dessert, taste foods)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(dessert, taste good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(dessert, taste foods)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(dessert, taste then healthier foods)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(dessert, taste foods)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(dessert, taste better healthier foods)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(dessert, taste foods)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(dessert, taste then healthier foods)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(dessert, taste foods)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(dessert, taste healthier foods)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(dessert, taste foods)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(dessert, taste then healthier foods)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(dessert, taste foods)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(dessert, taste healthier foods)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(dessert, taste foods)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(dessert, taste better then healthier foods)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(dessert, taste foods)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(dessert, taste healthier foods)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(dessert, taste foods)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(dessert, taste better healthier foods)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(dessert, taste foods)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(dessert, taste better then healthier foods)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(dessert, taste foods)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(dessert, taste better then healthier foods)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(dessert, taste foods)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(dessert, taste good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(dessert, taste foods)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(dessert, taste better healthier foods)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(dessert, taste foods)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(dessert, taste good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(dessert, taste foods)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(dessert, taste good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(dessert, taste foods)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(dessert, taste foods)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(dessert, taste foods)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(dessert, taste foods)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(dessert, taste foods)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(dessert, taste foods)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(sandwich, taste good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(dessert, taste foods)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(custard, is foods)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(dessert, taste foods)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(custard, is hazardous foods)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(dessert, taste foods)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(custard, taste)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(dessert, taste foods)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(sandwich, taste good)