sandwich: cut diagonally taste better

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dish
Weight: 0.67
, snack
Weight: 0.66
, meal
Weight: 0.64
, item
Weight: 0.63
Siblings breakfast
Weight: 0.69
, cheeseburger
Weight: 0.68
, burrito
Weight: 0.66
, taco
Weight: 0.65
, dessert
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
cut diagonally taste better 1.00
taste better cut diagonally 1.00
cut diagonally taste 0.99
taste cut diagonally 0.99
is cut diagonally 0.95
taste cut into triangles 0.83
taste better cut 0.82
cut taste better 0.82
taste better in triangles 0.80
cut taste 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(sandwich, cut diagonally taste better)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(sandwich, cut diagonally taste better)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(sandwich, cut diagonally taste better)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(sandwich, taste better cut diagonally)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(sandwich, cut diagonally taste better)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(sandwich, is cut diagonally)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(sandwich, cut diagonally taste better)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(sandwich, taste better cut diagonally)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(sandwich, cut diagonally taste better)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, is cut diagonally)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(sandwich, cut diagonally taste better)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(sandwich, taste better cut diagonally)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(sandwich, cut diagonally taste better)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, taste better cut diagonally)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(sandwich, cut diagonally taste better)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(sandwich, cut diagonally taste)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(sandwich, cut diagonally taste better)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(sandwich, cut diagonally taste)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(sandwich, cut diagonally taste better)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(sandwich, taste cut diagonally)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(sandwich, cut diagonally taste better)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(sandwich, taste cut diagonally)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(sandwich, cut diagonally taste better)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(sandwich, is cut diagonally)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(sandwich, cut diagonally taste better)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(sandwich, cut diagonally taste)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(sandwich, cut diagonally taste better)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, taste cut diagonally)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(sandwich, cut diagonally taste better)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(sandwich, taste cut diagonally)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(sandwich, cut diagonally taste better)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(sandwich, taste cut into triangles)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(sandwich, cut diagonally taste better)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(sandwich, taste better cut)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(sandwich, cut diagonally taste better)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(sandwich, taste better in triangles)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(sandwich, cut diagonally taste better)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, taste cut into triangles)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(sandwich, cut diagonally taste better)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, cut diagonally taste)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(sandwich, cut diagonally taste better)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(sandwich, taste better in triangles)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(sandwich, cut diagonally taste better)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(sandwich, taste better cut)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(sandwich, cut diagonally taste better)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, taste better cut)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(sandwich, cut diagonally taste better)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(sandwich, taste cut into triangles)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(sandwich, cut diagonally taste better)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, taste better in triangles)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(sandwich, cut diagonally taste better)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(sandwich, taste better in triangles)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(sandwich, cut diagonally taste better)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(sandwich, taste better cut)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(sandwich, cut diagonally taste better)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(sandwich, is cut diagonally)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(sandwich, cut diagonally taste better)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(sandwich, cut taste)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(sandwich, cut diagonally taste better)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(sandwich, cut taste better)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(sandwich, cut diagonally taste better)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sandwich, cut taste better)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(sandwich, cut diagonally taste better)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(sandwich, cut taste)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(sandwich, cut diagonally taste better)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(sandwich, cut taste better)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(sandwich, cut diagonally taste better)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(sandwich, cut taste)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(sandwich, cut diagonally taste better)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, cut taste better)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(sandwich, cut diagonally taste better)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, cut taste)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(sandwich, cut diagonally taste better)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(sandwich, taste cut into triangles)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(sandwich, cut diagonally taste better)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(sandwich, cut diagonally taste better)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, cut diagonally taste better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(sandwich, cut diagonally taste better)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(sandwich, cut diagonally taste better)