sandwich: taste better in triangles

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dish
Weight: 0.67
, snack
Weight: 0.66
, meal
Weight: 0.64
, item
Weight: 0.63
Siblings breakfast
Weight: 0.69
, cheeseburger
Weight: 0.68
, burrito
Weight: 0.66
, taco
Weight: 0.65
, dessert
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
taste better in triangles 1.00
taste cut into triangles 0.94
be cut in triangles 0.89
cut in triangles 0.89
cut into triangles 0.88
cut diagonally taste better 0.80
taste better cut diagonally 0.80
taste better cut 0.78
cut taste better 0.78
taste good 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, taste better in triangles)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(cheeseburger, taste good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, taste better in triangles)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(dessert, taste good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(sandwich, taste better in triangles)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(dessert, taste good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(dessert, taste good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(sandwich, taste better in triangles)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(cheeseburger, taste good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(cheeseburger, taste good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(sandwich, taste better in triangles)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(sandwich, taste better in triangles)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(sandwich, taste better in triangles)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(sandwich, cut into triangles)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(sandwich, taste better in triangles)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(sandwich, be cut in triangles)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(sandwich, taste better in triangles)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(sandwich, cut into triangles)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(sandwich, taste better in triangles)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(sandwich, be cut in triangles)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(sandwich, taste better in triangles)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, taste cut into triangles)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(sandwich, taste better in triangles)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, be cut in triangles)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(sandwich, taste better in triangles)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, cut into triangles)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(sandwich, taste better in triangles)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(sandwich, cut in triangles)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(sandwich, taste better in triangles)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(sandwich, cut in triangles)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(sandwich, taste better in triangles)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, cut in triangles)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(sandwich, taste better in triangles)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(sandwich, cut into triangles)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(sandwich, taste better in triangles)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(sandwich, taste cut into triangles)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(sandwich, taste better in triangles)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(sandwich, be cut in triangles)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(sandwich, taste better in triangles)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(sandwich, cut in triangles)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(sandwich, taste better in triangles)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(sandwich, taste cut into triangles)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(sandwich, taste better in triangles)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, taste better cut)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(sandwich, taste better in triangles)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(sandwich, taste better cut)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(sandwich, taste better in triangles)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(sandwich, taste better cut)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(sandwich, taste better in triangles)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(sandwich, taste better cut)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(sandwich, taste better in triangles)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, taste better cut diagonally)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(sandwich, taste better in triangles)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, cut taste better)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(sandwich, taste better in triangles)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(sandwich, taste better cut diagonally)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(sandwich, taste better in triangles)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(sandwich, cut diagonally taste better)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(sandwich, taste better in triangles)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sandwich, cut taste better)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(sandwich, taste better in triangles)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, cut diagonally taste better)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(sandwich, taste better in triangles)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(sandwich, taste better cut diagonally)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(sandwich, taste better in triangles)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(sandwich, taste cut into triangles)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(sandwich, taste better in triangles)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(sandwich, taste good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(sandwich, taste better in triangles)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(sandwich, taste better cut diagonally)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(sandwich, taste better in triangles)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(sandwich, cut taste better)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(sandwich, taste better in triangles)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(sandwich, cut diagonally taste better)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(sandwich, taste better in triangles)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, taste good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(sandwich, taste better in triangles)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(sandwich, cut taste better)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(sandwich, taste better in triangles)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(sandwich, cut diagonally taste better)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(sandwich, taste better in triangles)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(sandwich, taste good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(sandwich, taste better in triangles)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(sandwich, taste good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(sandwich, taste better in triangles)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(sandwich, taste better in triangles)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, taste better in triangles)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(sandwich, taste better in triangles)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(sandwich, taste better in triangles)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, taste better in triangles)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(dessert, taste good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, taste better in triangles)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(cheeseburger, taste good)