sandwich: cut in triangles

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dish
Weight: 0.67
, snack
Weight: 0.66
, meal
Weight: 0.64
, item
Weight: 0.63
Siblings breakfast
Weight: 0.69
, cheeseburger
Weight: 0.68
, burrito
Weight: 0.66
, taco
Weight: 0.65
, dessert
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
cut in triangles 1.00
be cut in triangles 1.00
cut into triangles 0.98
taste cut into triangles 0.94
taste better in triangles 0.89
is cut diagonally 0.79
cut diagonally taste 0.78
taste cut diagonally 0.78
cut diagonally taste better 0.77
taste better cut diagonally 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(sandwich, cut in triangles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(sandwich, cut in triangles)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(sandwich, cut in triangles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(sandwich, cut into triangles)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(sandwich, cut in triangles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(sandwich, be cut in triangles)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(sandwich, cut in triangles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(sandwich, be cut in triangles)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(sandwich, cut in triangles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(sandwich, cut into triangles)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(sandwich, cut in triangles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, be cut in triangles)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(sandwich, cut in triangles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, cut into triangles)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(sandwich, cut in triangles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(sandwich, cut into triangles)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(sandwich, cut in triangles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(sandwich, be cut in triangles)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(sandwich, cut in triangles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, taste cut into triangles)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(sandwich, cut in triangles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(sandwich, taste cut into triangles)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(sandwich, cut in triangles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, taste better in triangles)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(sandwich, cut in triangles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(sandwich, taste better in triangles)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(sandwich, cut in triangles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(sandwich, taste better in triangles)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(sandwich, cut in triangles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(sandwich, taste cut into triangles)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(sandwich, cut in triangles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(sandwich, taste better in triangles)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(sandwich, cut in triangles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, is cut diagonally)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(sandwich, cut in triangles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, taste better cut diagonally)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(sandwich, cut in triangles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, taste cut diagonally)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(sandwich, cut in triangles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(sandwich, is cut diagonally)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(sandwich, cut in triangles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(sandwich, is cut diagonally)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(sandwich, cut in triangles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, cut diagonally taste)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(sandwich, cut in triangles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, cut diagonally taste better)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(sandwich, cut in triangles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(sandwich, taste better cut diagonally)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(sandwich, cut in triangles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(sandwich, cut diagonally taste)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(sandwich, cut in triangles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(sandwich, cut diagonally taste better)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(sandwich, cut in triangles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(sandwich, taste cut diagonally)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(sandwich, cut in triangles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(sandwich, taste better cut diagonally)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(sandwich, cut in triangles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(sandwich, taste better cut diagonally)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(sandwich, cut in triangles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(sandwich, taste cut into triangles)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(sandwich, cut in triangles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(sandwich, cut diagonally taste better)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(sandwich, cut in triangles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(sandwich, cut diagonally taste)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(sandwich, cut in triangles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(sandwich, cut diagonally taste better)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(sandwich, cut in triangles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(sandwich, taste cut diagonally)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(sandwich, cut in triangles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(sandwich, cut diagonally taste)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(sandwich, cut in triangles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(sandwich, taste cut diagonally)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(sandwich, cut in triangles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(sandwich, is cut diagonally)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(sandwich, cut in triangles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(sandwich, cut in triangles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, cut in triangles)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(sandwich, cut in triangles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(sandwich, cut in triangles)